Additive construction in practice – Realities of acceptance criteria

Additive Construction has increased dramatically within the United States in the last few years. Efforts to develop acceptance criteria have increased since 2020 and are being developed through integration of research efforts and early engagement with partners across academia, industry, and government. This review paper builds on the work by Bos et al. (2022) through addressing gaps identified and outlines developments within the United States through engagements with the international community to align experts within the field towards common goals, acceptance criteria, and the early integration of acceptance criteria with lessons learned for Additive Construction in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cement and Concrete Research
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107652
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additive construction in practice – Realities of acceptance criteria

Megan Kreiger, Sean Monkman, Shawn Platt, Scott Z. Jones et al.
14 citations
Cement and Concrete Research
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
3.71
article

Additive construction in practice – Realities of acceptance criteria

Megan Kreiger, Sean Monkman, Shawn Platt, Scott Z. Jones, Eric Kreiger, Mohammad Aghajani Delavar, Petros Sideris, Casey Roberts, Matthew Friedell, Stephan Mansour
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Additive Construction has increased dramatically within the United States in the last few years. Efforts to develop acceptance criteria have increased since 2020 and are being developed through integration of research efforts and early engagement with partners across academia, industry, and government. This review paper builds on the work by Bos et al. (2022) through addressing gaps identified and outlines developments within the United States through engagements with the international community to align experts within the field towards common goals, acceptance criteria, and the early integration of acceptance criteria with lessons learned for Additive Construction in practice.

Cement and Concrete ResearchVol. 186
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), American Society For Testing and Materials (US), Austin Graduate School of Theology (US), Robotic Technology (United States) (US), Walker (United States) (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
3.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.