When Peace Interventions Become Elusive: The Convoluted Darfur Conflict

The conflict in Darfur, rooted in longstanding tensions among ethnic and political groups in western Sudan, is marked by widespread violence, displacement, and human rights abuses. Whereas there have been concerted efforts by successive governments and different local, regional, and national stakeholders to resolve these conflicts through various transitional justice and traditional mechanisms, these interventions have largely been ineffective, often resulting in accusations of bias and unequal treatment by the Khartoum government. This article seeks to evaluate conflict intervention efforts by different actors such as the Sudan government, the African Union (AU), Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD), regional governments, and the United Nations (UN). The discussions will highlight both successes and failures of peace interventions in Darfur, the complexity of the conflict ecology in Sudan and the region, and the need to bring internal and external stakeholders to the negotiation table for sustainable peace.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œjournal of social encounters.
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69755/2995-2212.1280
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Peace Interventions Become Elusive: The Convoluted Darfur Conflict

Elias O. Opongo
˜The œjournal of social encounters.
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

When Peace Interventions Become Elusive: The Convoluted Darfur Conflict

Elias O. Opongo
article en

Abstract

The conflict in Darfur, rooted in longstanding tensions among ethnic and political groups in western Sudan, is marked by widespread violence, displacement, and human rights abuses. Whereas there have been concerted efforts by successive governments and different local, regional, and national stakeholders to resolve these conflicts through various transitional justice and traditional mechanisms, these interventions have largely been ineffective, often resulting in accusations of bias and unequal treatment by the Khartoum government. This article seeks to evaluate conflict intervention efforts by different actors such as the Sudan government, the African Union (AU), Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD), regional governments, and the United Nations (UN). The discussions will highlight both successes and failures of peace interventions in Darfur, the complexity of the conflict ecology in Sudan and the region, and the need to bring internal and external stakeholders to the negotiation table for sustainable peace.

˜The œjournal of social encounters.Vol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.