Moral Experience and Critique in <i>für sich</i>: Indications from Thomas Luckmann’s Theory of Morality

The aim of this paper is to investigate possibilities in the critiques of everyday life based on individual morality in terms of the phenomenological arguments of Thomas Luckmann. Considering the multiple realities theory of Alfred Schutz, the critique of everyday life needs a finite province of meaning (“the world of morality” against “the world of everyday life”) and “moral experience” within the realm in which one is aware of one’s own way of thinking about morality. The critique needs to be in “für sich,” open to criticizing itself (distinguished from that in “an sich” from a static and taken-for-granted standpoint). The study implies that the moral experience that leads to critiques of everyday life necessarily includes the three processes: 1) an attempt to separate value from obligation; 2) critiques of obligation according to one’s value; 3) constant reflections on whether and how the value is affected by the obligation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annual review of sociology
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5690/kantoh.2024.139
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral Experience and Critique in für sich: Indications from Thomas Luckmann’s Theory of Morality

Yu Mitsuda
The Annual review of sociology
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Moral Experience and Critique in für sich: Indications from Thomas Luckmann’s Theory of Morality

Yu Mitsuda
article en

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate possibilities in the critiques of everyday life based on individual morality in terms of the phenomenological arguments of Thomas Luckmann. Considering the multiple realities theory of Alfred Schutz, the critique of everyday life needs a finite province of meaning (“the world of morality” against “the world of everyday life”) and “moral experience” within the realm in which one is aware of one’s own way of thinking about morality. The critique needs to be in “für sich,” open to criticizing itself (distinguished from that in “an sich” from a static and taken-for-granted standpoint). The study implies that the moral experience that leads to critiques of everyday life necessarily includes the three processes: 1) an attempt to separate value from obligation; 2) critiques of obligation according to one’s value; 3) constant reflections on whether and how the value is affected by the obligation.

The Annual review of sociologyVol. 2024(37)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.