Accessibility of low-code approaches: A systematic literature review

Model-driven approaches are increasingly used in different domains, such as education, finance and app development, in order to involve non-developers in the software development process. Such tools are hugely dependent on visual elements and thus might not be accessible for users with specific challenges, e.g., visual impairments. To locate and analyse existing literature on the accessibility of low-code approaches, their strengths and weaknesses and key directions for future research. We carried out a systematic literature review and searched through five leading databases for primary studies. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods for data synthesis. After reviewing and filtering 918 located studies, and conducting both backward and forward snowballing, we identified 38 primary studies that were included in our analysis. We found most papers focusing on accessibility of visual languages and block-based programming. Limited work has been done on improving low code programming environment accessibility. The findings of this systematic literature review will assist researchers and developers in understanding the accessibility issues in low-code approaches and what has been done so far to develop accessible approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Software Technology
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107570
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessibility of low-code approaches: A systematic literature review

Hourieh Khalajzadeh, John Grundy
11 citations
Information and Software Technology
Software Engineering Research
8.57
article

Accessibility of low-code approaches: A systematic literature review

Hourieh Khalajzadeh, John Grundy
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Model-driven approaches are increasingly used in different domains, such as education, finance and app development, in order to involve non-developers in the software development process. Such tools are hugely dependent on visual elements and thus might not be accessible for users with specific challenges, e.g., visual impairments. To locate and analyse existing literature on the accessibility of low-code approaches, their strengths and weaknesses and key directions for future research. We carried out a systematic literature review and searched through five leading databases for primary studies. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods for data synthesis. After reviewing and filtering 918 located studies, and conducting both backward and forward snowballing, we identified 38 primary studies that were included in our analysis. We found most papers focusing on accessibility of visual languages and block-based programming. Limited work has been done on improving low code programming environment accessibility. The findings of this systematic literature review will assist researchers and developers in understanding the accessibility issues in low-code approaches and what has been done so far to develop accessible approaches.

Information and Software TechnologyVol. 177
Deakin University (AU), Monash University (AU)
Monash University, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Software Engineering Research
8.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.