Does Bold Forecast After Job Change Improve Forecast Accuracy? Evidence From Korean Sell‐Side Analysts

Abstract This paper investigates how incentives generated by intrafirm tournaments affect the informativeness of bold forecasts issued by sell‐side analysts who have recently switched employers. Prior literature suggests that bold forecasts may lose accuracy when they are influenced by tournament‐induced incentives. Extending this literature, I find that bold forecasts from transitioning analysts tend to result in decreased forecast accuracy. This negative effect is mitigated when analysts are less concerned about their disadvantages in the new intrafirm tournament—specifically, when they are more experienced, more competent, or have moved to more prosperous brokerage houses. These findings suggest that bold forecasts by transitioning analysts are partly influenced by intrafirm tournament‐induced risk‐taking, which can deteriorate performance quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12495
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Bold Forecast After Job Change Improve Forecast Accuracy? Evidence From Korean Sell‐Side Analysts

Sohee Park
1 citations
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
0.49
article

Does Bold Forecast After Job Change Improve Forecast Accuracy? Evidence From Korean Sell‐Side Analysts

Sohee Park
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates how incentives generated by intrafirm tournaments affect the informativeness of bold forecasts issued by sell‐side analysts who have recently switched employers. Prior literature suggests that bold forecasts may lose accuracy when they are influenced by tournament‐induced incentives. Extending this literature, I find that bold forecasts from transitioning analysts tend to result in decreased forecast accuracy. This negative effect is mitigated when analysts are less concerned about their disadvantages in the new intrafirm tournament—specifically, when they are more experienced, more competent, or have moved to more prosperous brokerage houses. These findings suggest that bold forecasts by transitioning analysts are partly influenced by intrafirm tournament‐induced risk‐taking, which can deteriorate performance quality.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 53(6)
Kookmin University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Bold Forecast After Job Change Improve Forecast Accuracy? Evidence From Korean Sell‐Side Analysts — Sohee Park · Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS