Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: A randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket

Providing consumers with product-specific environmental impact information for food products (ecolabels) may promote more sustainable purchasing, needed to meet global environmental targets. This UK study (N = 1051 participants) investigated the effectiveness of different ecolabels using an experimental online supermarket platform, comparing three labels against control (no label). Significant reductions were found in the environmental impact score (EIS) for all labels compared to control (labels presented: values for four environmental indicators [-3.9 percentiles, 95%CIs: -5.3, -2.6]; a composite score [taking values from A to E; -3.9, 95%CIs: -5.2,-2.5]; or both together [-3.2, 95%CIs: -4.5, -1.9]). Providing ecolabels is a promising intervention to promote the selection of more sustainable products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309386
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: A randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket

Kerstin Frie, Rachel Pechey, Brian Cook, John Lynch et al.
13 citations
PLoS ONE
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.97
article

Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: A randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket

Kerstin Frie, Rachel Pechey, Brian Cook, John Lynch, Carmen Piernas, Christina Potter, Michael Clark, Cristina Stewart, Susan A. Jebb, Joseph Poore, Paul Bateman, Mike Rayner
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Providing consumers with product-specific environmental impact information for food products (ecolabels) may promote more sustainable purchasing, needed to meet global environmental targets. This UK study (N = 1051 participants) investigated the effectiveness of different ecolabels using an experimental online supermarket platform, comparing three labels against control (no label). Significant reductions were found in the environmental impact score (EIS) for all labels compared to control (labels presented: values for four environmental indicators [-3.9 percentiles, 95%CIs: -5.3, -2.6]; a composite score [taking values from A to E; -3.9, 95%CIs: -5.2,-2.5]; or both together [-3.2, 95%CIs: -4.5, -1.9]). Providing ecolabels is a promising intervention to promote the selection of more sustainable products.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(9)
University of Oxford (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.