Pore pressure prediction of hydrocarbon reservoirs with empirical models and artificial neural network: case study in the Doba basin, Chad

Accurate Pore pressure prediction is essential in drilling as it enables drilling hazards to be avoided. However, traditional methods of pore pressure prediction, especially empirical methods are field-specific. It is therefore important to evaluate the best empirical method which is to be applied in any basin or field according to its main characteristics. Besides, recently, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are the most used for pore pressure prediction because they can help to learn complex relationships between input and output parameters. They lead to accurate pore pressure prediction results in many cases. In light of this, the aim of this study carried out in the Doba basin is to analyse and compare the applicability of various sonic log-based empirical models of pore pressure prediction, including Eaton’s model, Raymer-Hunt’s model and Kozeny-Carman’s model and a ANN model of pore pressure prediction in order to find out the best predictive one to use in the studied area in order to achieve better prediction results. To achieve this objective, firstly, the mathematical models of pore pressure prediction from Eaton, Terzaghi and Raymer-Hunt equations and Kozeny-Carman’s model were used. The artificial neural network method uses 33 datasets of well log data including sonic transient time, vertical stress and porosity as input parameters to train the ANN model. The output parameters are the measured pore pressures produced by the Repeat Formation Tester. Using 70% of data set for training, 15% for test and 15% for validation, the trained model with the Bayesian Regularization Backpropagation function predicts pore pressure with an average correlation coefficient of 98%. The results show that pore pressure obtained from the Kozeny-Carman’s model, also has a 98% correlation coefficient, thus proving to be the most accurate of empirical methods. Indeed, pore pressures obtained from Raymer-Hunt’s model and Eaton’s model have 97% and 90% respectively as correlation coefficients. This study provides the best and most reliable empirical method of sonic log-based pore pressure prediction to use in the Doba basin, which can be used to achieve the best pore pressure prediction results and hence ensures drilling safety and wellbore stability in the studied area. The study also highlights a good application of the Bayesian function of the ANN for pore pressure prediction in the investigated area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Geoscience
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00061-x
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pore pressure prediction of hydrocarbon reservoirs with empirical models and artificial neural network: case study in the Doba basin, Chad

Théodore Tchotang, Luc Leroy Mambou Ngueyep, Justine Bawane Godwe, Jordan Eze Eze
Discover Geoscience
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Pore pressure prediction of hydrocarbon reservoirs with empirical models and artificial neural network: case study in the Doba basin, Chad

Théodore Tchotang, Luc Leroy Mambou Ngueyep, Justine Bawane Godwe, Jordan Eze Eze
article en

Abstract

Accurate Pore pressure prediction is essential in drilling as it enables drilling hazards to be avoided. However, traditional methods of pore pressure prediction, especially empirical methods are field-specific. It is therefore important to evaluate the best empirical method which is to be applied in any basin or field according to its main characteristics. Besides, recently, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are the most used for pore pressure prediction because they can help to learn complex relationships between input and output parameters. They lead to accurate pore pressure prediction results in many cases. In light of this, the aim of this study carried out in the Doba basin is to analyse and compare the applicability of various sonic log-based empirical models of pore pressure prediction, including Eaton’s model, Raymer-Hunt’s model and Kozeny-Carman’s model and a ANN model of pore pressure prediction in order to find out the best predictive one to use in the studied area in order to achieve better prediction results. To achieve this objective, firstly, the mathematical models of pore pressure prediction from Eaton, Terzaghi and Raymer-Hunt equations and Kozeny-Carman’s model were used. The artificial neural network method uses 33 datasets of well log data including sonic transient time, vertical stress and porosity as input parameters to train the ANN model. The output parameters are the measured pore pressures produced by the Repeat Formation Tester. Using 70% of data set for training, 15% for test and 15% for validation, the trained model with the Bayesian Regularization Backpropagation function predicts pore pressure with an average correlation coefficient of 98%. The results show that pore pressure obtained from the Kozeny-Carman’s model, also has a 98% correlation coefficient, thus proving to be the most accurate of empirical methods. Indeed, pore pressures obtained from Raymer-Hunt’s model and Eaton’s model have 97% and 90% respectively as correlation coefficients. This study provides the best and most reliable empirical method of sonic log-based pore pressure prediction to use in the Doba basin, which can be used to achieve the best pore pressure prediction results and hence ensures drilling safety and wellbore stability in the studied area. The study also highlights a good application of the Bayesian function of the ANN for pore pressure prediction in the investigated area.

Discover GeoscienceVol. 2(1)
Université de Yaoundé I (CM), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR), University of Ngaoundéré (CM)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.