Alias‐informed model selection (AIMS) for 7 and 8 factor no‐confounding 16‐run fractional factorial designs

Abstract Nonregular fractional factorial designs are a preferable alternative to regular resolution IV designs because they avoid confounding 2‐factor interactions. As a result, nonregular designs can estimate and identify a few active 2‐factor interactions. However, due to the sometimes complex alias structure of nonregular designs, standard factor screening strategies can fail to identify all active effects. We report on a screening technique that takes advantage of the alias structure of these nonregular designs. This alias‐informed‐model‐selection (AIMS) technique has been used previously for a specific 6‐factor nonregular design. We show how the AIMS technique can be applied to 7‐ and 8‐factor nonregular designs, completing the exposition of this method for all 16‐run 2‐level designs that are viable alternatives to standard Resolution IV fractional factorial designs. We compare AIMS to three other standard analysis methods for nonregular designs, stepwise regression, the lasso, and the Dantzig selector. AIMS consistently outperforms these methods in identifying the set of active factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3650
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alias‐informed model selection (AIMS) for 7 and 8 factor no‐confounding 16‐run fractional factorial designs

Carly E. Metcalfe, Douglas C. Montgomery, Bradley Jones
2 citations
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
0.98
article

Alias‐informed model selection (AIMS) for 7 and 8 factor no‐confounding 16‐run fractional factorial designs

Carly E. Metcalfe, Douglas C. Montgomery, Bradley Jones
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Nonregular fractional factorial designs are a preferable alternative to regular resolution IV designs because they avoid confounding 2‐factor interactions. As a result, nonregular designs can estimate and identify a few active 2‐factor interactions. However, due to the sometimes complex alias structure of nonregular designs, standard factor screening strategies can fail to identify all active effects. We report on a screening technique that takes advantage of the alias structure of these nonregular designs. This alias‐informed‐model‐selection (AIMS) technique has been used previously for a specific 6‐factor nonregular design. We show how the AIMS technique can be applied to 7‐ and 8‐factor nonregular designs, completing the exposition of this method for all 16‐run 2‐level designs that are viable alternatives to standard Resolution IV fractional factorial designs. We compare AIMS to three other standard analysis methods for nonregular designs, stepwise regression, the lasso, and the Dantzig selector. AIMS consistently outperforms these methods in identifying the set of active factors.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(1)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Adroit Materials (United States) (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.