Comparison of Likelihood Ratios from Probabilistic Genotyping for Two-Person Mixtures across Different Assays and Instruments

Continuous probabilistic genotyping (PG) provides a means to estimate the probative value of DNA mixtures tendered as evidence in court and subject to alternative propositions about the contributors to the mixtures. The weight of that evidence, however, may be valued differently, depending on which forensic laboratory undertook the DNA analysis. There is a need, therefore, to have a means for the comparison of likelihood ratios (LRs) generated by continuous PG amongst different laboratories for the same initial DNA sample. Such a comparison would enable the courts and the public to make judgements about the reliability of this type of evidence. There are particular mixtures and methods for which such a comparison is meaningful, and this study explores them for the short tandem repeat (STR) electropherograms of two-person mixtures obtained from the PROVEDIt Database. We demonstrate a common maximum attainable LR for a given set of common STR loci and a given DNA mixture that is consistent across three different STR profiling assays and two different capillary electrophoresis instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Sciences
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci4030028
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Likelihood Ratios from Probabilistic Genotyping for Two-Person Mixtures across Different Assays and Instruments

Mark Barash, Dennis McNevin
Forensic Sciences
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

Comparison of Likelihood Ratios from Probabilistic Genotyping for Two-Person Mixtures across Different Assays and Instruments

Mark Barash, Dennis McNevin
article en

Abstract

Continuous probabilistic genotyping (PG) provides a means to estimate the probative value of DNA mixtures tendered as evidence in court and subject to alternative propositions about the contributors to the mixtures. The weight of that evidence, however, may be valued differently, depending on which forensic laboratory undertook the DNA analysis. There is a need, therefore, to have a means for the comparison of likelihood ratios (LRs) generated by continuous PG amongst different laboratories for the same initial DNA sample. Such a comparison would enable the courts and the public to make judgements about the reliability of this type of evidence. There are particular mixtures and methods for which such a comparison is meaningful, and this study explores them for the short tandem repeat (STR) electropherograms of two-person mixtures obtained from the PROVEDIt Database. We demonstrate a common maximum attainable LR for a given set of common STR loci and a given DNA mixture that is consistent across three different STR profiling assays and two different capillary electrophoresis instruments.

Forensic SciencesVol. 4(3)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), San Jose State University (US)
School of Medicine, Boston University
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Likelihood Ratios from Probabilistic Genotyping for Two-Person Mixtures across Different Assays and Instruments — Mark Barash, Dennis McNevin · Forensic Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS