Round-Trip Time Ranging to Wi-Fi Access Points Beats GNSS Localization

Wi-Fi round-trip time (RTT) ranging has proven successful in indoor localization. Here, it is shown to be useful outdoors as well—and more accurate than smartphone code-based GNSS when used near buildings with Wi-Fi access points (APs). A Bayesian grid with observation and transition models is used to update a probability distribution of the position of the user equipment (UE). The expected value (or the mode) of this probability distribution provides an estimate of the UE location. Localization of the UE using RTT ranging depends on knowing the locations of the Wi-Fi APs. Determining these positions from floor plans can be time-consuming, particularly when the APs may not be accessible (as is often the case in order to prevent unauthorized access to the network). An alternative is to invert the Bayesian grid method for locating the UE—which uses distance measurements from the UE to several APs with known position. In the inverted method we instead locate the AP using distance measurements from several known positions of the UE. In localization using RTT, at any given time, a decision has to be made as to which APs to range to, given that there is a cost associated with each “range probe” and that some APs may not respond. This can be problematic when the APs are not uniformly distributed. Without a suitable ranging strategy, one can enter a dead-end state where there is no response from any of the APs currently being ranged to. This is a particular concern when there are local clusters of APs that may “capture” the attention of the RTT app. To avoid this, a strategy is developed here that takes into account distance, signal strength, time since last “seen”, and the distribution of the directions to APs from the UE—plus a random contribution. We demonstrate the method in a situation where there are no line-of-sight (LOS) connections and where the APs are inaccessible. The localization accuracy achieved exceeds that of the smartphone code-based GNSS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177805
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Round-Trip Time Ranging to Wi-Fi Access Points Beats GNSS Localization

Berthold K. P. Horn
7 citations
Applied Sciences
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
1.46
article

Round-Trip Time Ranging to Wi-Fi Access Points Beats GNSS Localization

Berthold K. P. Horn
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Wi-Fi round-trip time (RTT) ranging has proven successful in indoor localization. Here, it is shown to be useful outdoors as well—and more accurate than smartphone code-based GNSS when used near buildings with Wi-Fi access points (APs). A Bayesian grid with observation and transition models is used to update a probability distribution of the position of the user equipment (UE). The expected value (or the mode) of this probability distribution provides an estimate of the UE location. Localization of the UE using RTT ranging depends on knowing the locations of the Wi-Fi APs. Determining these positions from floor plans can be time-consuming, particularly when the APs may not be accessible (as is often the case in order to prevent unauthorized access to the network). An alternative is to invert the Bayesian grid method for locating the UE—which uses distance measurements from the UE to several APs with known position. In the inverted method we instead locate the AP using distance measurements from several known positions of the UE. In localization using RTT, at any given time, a decision has to be made as to which APs to range to, given that there is a cost associated with each “range probe” and that some APs may not respond. This can be problematic when the APs are not uniformly distributed. Without a suitable ranging strategy, one can enter a dead-end state where there is no response from any of the APs currently being ranged to. This is a particular concern when there are local clusters of APs that may “capture” the attention of the RTT app. To avoid this, a strategy is developed here that takes into account distance, signal strength, time since last “seen”, and the distribution of the directions to APs from the UE—plus a random contribution. We demonstrate the method in a situation where there are no line-of-sight (LOS) connections and where the APs are inaccessible. The localization accuracy achieved exceeds that of the smartphone code-based GNSS.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(17)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.