Development and content validation of the Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial–Revised (Youth ANZ–EFST–R)

The Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial-Revised (Youth ANZ-EFST-R) was developed to address the lack of forensic assessment standardisation. Following development, 36 legal and mental health practitioners reviewed the proposed interview items to test the face, content and factor validity. Overall, 71% of items passed the validity thresholds. Items with poor validity related to the courtroom layout and psychotic symptoms affecting the defendant's communication. Removing these items resulted in a 93% validity pass rate. There was moderate agreement about the proposed factor structure despite randomising the order and blinding participants to the administration rules (Gwet's AC2 = .61, <i>p <</i> .001). The results provide preliminary support for the Youth ANZ-EFST-R with specified refinements made to enhance validity. Key limitations include the small sample size and the assumption of no crossloading items despite overlaps between the <i>Presser</i> criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2346740
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and content validation of the Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial–Revised (Youth ANZ–EFST–R)

Grant A. Blake, Scott Harden, Chelsea Leach, James R. P. Ogloff
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Development and content validation of the Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial–Revised (Youth ANZ–EFST–R)

Grant A. Blake, Scott Harden, Chelsea Leach, James R. P. Ogloff
article en

Abstract

The Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial-Revised (Youth ANZ-EFST-R) was developed to address the lack of forensic assessment standardisation. Following development, 36 legal and mental health practitioners reviewed the proposed interview items to test the face, content and factor validity. Overall, 71% of items passed the validity thresholds. Items with poor validity related to the courtroom layout and psychotic symptoms affecting the defendant's communication. Removing these items resulted in a 93% validity pass rate. There was moderate agreement about the proposed factor structure despite randomising the order and blinding participants to the administration rules (Gwet's AC2 = .61, <i>p <</i> .001). The results provide preliminary support for the Youth ANZ-EFST-R with specified refinements made to enhance validity. Key limitations include the small sample size and the assumption of no crossloading items despite overlaps between the <i>Presser</i> criteria.

Psychiatry Psychology and LawVol. 32(6)
Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and content validation of the Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial–Revised (Youth ANZ–EFST–R) — Grant A. Blake, Scott Harden, et al. · Psychiatry Psychology and Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS