Evidence of longitudinal differences in spring migration strategies of an Arctic‐nesting goose

During spring, migratory birds are required to optimally balance energetic costs of migration across heterogeneous landscapes and weather conditions to survive and reproduce successfully. Therefore, an individual's migratory performance may influence reproductive outcomes. Given large-scale changes in land use, climate, and potential carry-over effects, understanding how individuals migrate in relation to breeding outcomes is critical to predicting how future scenarios may affect populations. We used GPS tracking devices on 56 Greater White-fronted Geese (<i>Anser albifrons</i>) during four spring migrations to examine whether migration characteristics influenced breeding propensity and breeding outcome. We found a strong longitudinal difference in arrival to the breeding areas (18 days earlier), pre-nesting duration (90.9% longer), and incubation initiation dates (9 days earlier) between western- and eastern-Arctic breeding regions, with contrasting effects on breeding outcomes, but no migration characteristic strongly influenced breeding outcome. We found that breeding region influenced whether an individual likely pursued a capital or income breeding strategy. Where individuals fell along the capital-income breeding continuum was influenced by longitude, revealing geographic effects of life-history strategy among conspecifics. Factors that govern breeding outcomes likely occur primarily upon arrival to breeding areas or are related to individual quality and previous breeding outcome, and may not be directly tied to migratory decision-making across broad scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11665
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence of longitudinal differences in spring migration strategies of an Arctic‐nesting goose

Kevin J. Kraai, Mitch D. Weegman, Jay A. VonBank, Paul Link et al.
2 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Marine animal studies overview
0.92
article

Evidence of longitudinal differences in spring migration strategies of an Arctic‐nesting goose

Kevin J. Kraai, Mitch D. Weegman, Jay A. VonBank, Paul Link, Bart M. Ballard, Lei Cao, Daniel P. Collins
article en
2 citations

Abstract

During spring, migratory birds are required to optimally balance energetic costs of migration across heterogeneous landscapes and weather conditions to survive and reproduce successfully. Therefore, an individual's migratory performance may influence reproductive outcomes. Given large-scale changes in land use, climate, and potential carry-over effects, understanding how individuals migrate in relation to breeding outcomes is critical to predicting how future scenarios may affect populations. We used GPS tracking devices on 56 Greater White-fronted Geese (<i>Anser albifrons</i>) during four spring migrations to examine whether migration characteristics influenced breeding propensity and breeding outcome. We found a strong longitudinal difference in arrival to the breeding areas (18 days earlier), pre-nesting duration (90.9% longer), and incubation initiation dates (9 days earlier) between western- and eastern-Arctic breeding regions, with contrasting effects on breeding outcomes, but no migration characteristic strongly influenced breeding outcome. We found that breeding region influenced whether an individual likely pursued a capital or income breeding strategy. Where individuals fell along the capital-income breeding continuum was influenced by longitude, revealing geographic effects of life-history strategy among conspecifics. Factors that govern breeding outcomes likely occur primarily upon arrival to breeding areas or are related to individual quality and previous breeding outcome, and may not be directly tied to migratory decision-making across broad scales.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 14(9)
United States Geological Survey (US), Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (US), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Texas A&M University – Kingsville (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Marine animal studies overview
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.