Designing Rigorous and Efficient Clinical Utility Studies for Early Detection Biomarkers

Before implementing a biomarker in routine clinical care, it must demonstrate clinical utility by leading to clinical actions that positively affect patient-relevant outcomes. Randomly controlled early detection utility trials, especially those targeting mortality endpoint, are challenging due to their high costs and prolonged duration. Special design considerations are required to determine the clinical utility of early detection assays. This commentary reports on discussions among the National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network investigators, outlining the recommended process for carrying out single-organ biomarker-driven clinical utility studies. We present the early detection utility studies in the context of phased biomarker development. We describe aspects of the studies related to the features of biomarker tests, the clinical context of endpoints, the performance criteria for later phase evaluation, and study size. We discuss novel adaptive design approaches for improving the efficiency and practicality of clinical utility trials. We recommend using multiple strategies, including adopting real-world evidence, emulated trials, and mathematical modeling to circumvent the challenges in conducting early detection utility trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1594
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Rigorous and Efficient Clinical Utility Studies for Early Detection Biomarkers

Yingye Zheng, Amit G. Singal, Ying Huang, Paul D. Wagner et al.
3 citations
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.39
article

Designing Rigorous and Efficient Clinical Utility Studies for Early Detection Biomarkers

Yingye Zheng, Amit G. Singal, Ying Huang, Paul D. Wagner, Samir Hanash, Suresh T. Chari, Ying‐Qi Zhao, Ziding Feng, Tracey L. Marsh, Sudhir Srivastava, G.C. Hernández Marquez, Ruth Etizioni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Before implementing a biomarker in routine clinical care, it must demonstrate clinical utility by leading to clinical actions that positively affect patient-relevant outcomes. Randomly controlled early detection utility trials, especially those targeting mortality endpoint, are challenging due to their high costs and prolonged duration. Special design considerations are required to determine the clinical utility of early detection assays. This commentary reports on discussions among the National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network investigators, outlining the recommended process for carrying out single-organ biomarker-driven clinical utility studies. We present the early detection utility studies in the context of phased biomarker development. We describe aspects of the studies related to the features of biomarker tests, the clinical context of endpoints, the performance criteria for later phase evaluation, and study size. We discuss novel adaptive design approaches for improving the efficiency and practicality of clinical utility trials. We recommend using multiple strategies, including adopting real-world evidence, emulated trials, and mathematical modeling to circumvent the challenges in conducting early detection utility trials.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 33(9)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Biostats (United States) (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.