Measuring the quality of life of people with severe leprosy and lymphatic filariasis disability in India using an informal, intervention-focused, contextual, and integrated tool for NTD disability

Aim To measure the quality of life (QoL) of men and women suffering with severe leprosy and lymphatic filariasis (LF) disability in India and identify issues for priority management, using an informal, intervention-focused, contextual, and integrated tool for NTD disability. Methodology A stratified random sample of 150 people with leprosy WHO Grade 2 disability, LF WHO Grade 3+ lymphoedema, and LF hydrocoele, from 39 villages of one administrative Block in Bihar, India, participated in the study conducted in February 2022. A 30-question section of the tool covers activities of daily living (ADL); stigma; participation restrictions; mental wellbeing; and current satisfaction with life. Overall scores ≥60 indicate an ‘unacceptable’ QoL (people experience the disease and disability related problems ‘all of the time’ or 'some of the time’, requiring urgent interventions); scores <60 indicate an ‘acceptable’ QoL (people experience the problems ‘never‘ or ‘rarely’). An additional 14-question section with multiple-choice options elicits and quantifies the critical morbidity and disability-related issues faced to aid priority management. Kobo Toolbox was used for data collection; Microsoft Excel, R, and Tableau were used for analysis. Results The average QoL score of the participants was 82.95, indicating an ‘unacceptable’ QoL. The primary reasons for this were: problems with ambulation, 89.3% (n = 134); financial and employment difficulties, 88.6% (n = 133); non-availability of primary level care, 84.6% (n = 127); and a requirement for assistive devices for ADL, 80% (n = 120). Conclusions Our study found that the QoL of people living with severe NTD disability in Kalyanpur, Bihar is ‘unacceptable’, and identified interventions with the highest probability of improving the QoL for the majority, in the short term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leprosy Review
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47276/lr.95.3.2023073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Leprosy Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the quality of life of people with severe leprosy and lymphatic filariasis disability in India using an informal, intervention-focused, contextual, and integrated tool for NTD disability

Melissa Edmiston, Shyamala Anand, Annamma John, Rajni Kant Singh et al.
1 citations
Leprosy Review
Leprosy Research and Treatment
0.39
article

Measuring the quality of life of people with severe leprosy and lymphatic filariasis disability in India using an informal, intervention-focused, contextual, and integrated tool for NTD disability

Melissa Edmiston, Shyamala Anand, Annamma John, Rajni Kant Singh, Amar Bahadur Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim To measure the quality of life (QoL) of men and women suffering with severe leprosy and lymphatic filariasis (LF) disability in India and identify issues for priority management, using an informal, intervention-focused, contextual, and integrated tool for NTD disability. Methodology A stratified random sample of 150 people with leprosy WHO Grade 2 disability, LF WHO Grade 3+ lymphoedema, and LF hydrocoele, from 39 villages of one administrative Block in Bihar, India, participated in the study conducted in February 2022. A 30-question section of the tool covers activities of daily living (ADL); stigma; participation restrictions; mental wellbeing; and current satisfaction with life. Overall scores ≥60 indicate an ‘unacceptable’ QoL (people experience the disease and disability related problems ‘all of the time’ or 'some of the time’, requiring urgent interventions); scores <60 indicate an ‘acceptable’ QoL (people experience the problems ‘never‘ or ‘rarely’). An additional 14-question section with multiple-choice options elicits and quantifies the critical morbidity and disability-related issues faced to aid priority management. Kobo Toolbox was used for data collection; Microsoft Excel, R, and Tableau were used for analysis. Results The average QoL score of the participants was 82.95, indicating an ‘unacceptable’ QoL. The primary reasons for this were: problems with ambulation, 89.3% (n = 134); financial and employment difficulties, 88.6% (n = 133); non-availability of primary level care, 84.6% (n = 127); and a requirement for assistive devices for ADL, 80% (n = 120). Conclusions Our study found that the QoL of people living with severe NTD disability in Kalyanpur, Bihar is ‘unacceptable’, and identified interventions with the highest probability of improving the QoL for the majority, in the short term.

Leprosy ReviewVol. 95(3)
American Leprosy Missions (US), Lepra Society (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Leprosy Research and Treatment
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.