Study of Gynecological Cancer Heterogeneity in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Gynecological cancers, notably breast and ovarian cancers, exhibit significant heterogeneity, complicating treatment strategies and impacting patient outcomes. Traditional cancer models often fail to capture the complexity and diversity of these tumors. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offer a promising alternative for modeling cancer due to their ability to differentiate into various cell types. This study aims to establish and characterize iPSC-derived models of breast and ovarian cancers to explore their heterogeneity and therapeutic responses. We cultured iPSCs and differentiated them into breast and ovarian cancer cell lineages using lineage-specific protocols. Differentiation was confirmed by the expression of specific markers (CK14, CK18 for breast cancer; CA125, CK7 for ovarian cancer). We generated tumor spheroids from the differentiated cells and assessed their morphology, size, and viability. Functional assays revealed significant differences in invasive and migratory capabilities between the two cancer models. Gene and protein expression analyses highlighted the upregulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer models and higher TP53 expression in ovarian cancer models. Proliferation assays demonstrated variability in drug sensitivity, with breast cancer spheroids showing higher sensitivity to trastuzumab and ovarian cancer spheroids to olaparib. Apoptosis assays indicated higher basal and treatment-induced apoptotic activity in ovarian cancer spheroids. Angiogenesis potential, assessed using HUVEC tube formation assays, was greater in ovarian cancer models. Our results validate the use of iPSC-derived models for studying gynecological cancer heterogeneity. These models accurately reflect the molecular and functional diversity observed in patient tumors, providing a robust platform for investigating cancer biology and evaluating therapeutic strategies. Future research should expand these models to include additional gynecological cancers, incorporate patient-derived iPSCs for personalized medicine, and utilize multi-omics approaches to further understand cancer heterogeneity and improve treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer and Tumor International
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jcti/2024/v14i4262
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study of Gynecological Cancer Heterogeneity in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Emmanson Godswill, Chiamaka Mercy, Uchechukwu Gift Chinenye, Ochai Onyiba Blessing et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cancer and Tumor International
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
0.28
article

Study of Gynecological Cancer Heterogeneity in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Emmanson Godswill, Chiamaka Mercy, Uchechukwu Gift Chinenye, Ochai Onyiba Blessing, Ajifolawe Oladotun, King Williams, Franklin Uche, Williams Williams, Imonikhu Francis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gynecological cancers, notably breast and ovarian cancers, exhibit significant heterogeneity, complicating treatment strategies and impacting patient outcomes. Traditional cancer models often fail to capture the complexity and diversity of these tumors. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offer a promising alternative for modeling cancer due to their ability to differentiate into various cell types. This study aims to establish and characterize iPSC-derived models of breast and ovarian cancers to explore their heterogeneity and therapeutic responses. We cultured iPSCs and differentiated them into breast and ovarian cancer cell lineages using lineage-specific protocols. Differentiation was confirmed by the expression of specific markers (CK14, CK18 for breast cancer; CA125, CK7 for ovarian cancer). We generated tumor spheroids from the differentiated cells and assessed their morphology, size, and viability. Functional assays revealed significant differences in invasive and migratory capabilities between the two cancer models. Gene and protein expression analyses highlighted the upregulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer models and higher TP53 expression in ovarian cancer models. Proliferation assays demonstrated variability in drug sensitivity, with breast cancer spheroids showing higher sensitivity to trastuzumab and ovarian cancer spheroids to olaparib. Apoptosis assays indicated higher basal and treatment-induced apoptotic activity in ovarian cancer spheroids. Angiogenesis potential, assessed using HUVEC tube formation assays, was greater in ovarian cancer models. Our results validate the use of iPSC-derived models for studying gynecological cancer heterogeneity. These models accurately reflect the molecular and functional diversity observed in patient tumors, providing a robust platform for investigating cancer biology and evaluating therapeutic strategies. Future research should expand these models to include additional gynecological cancers, incorporate patient-derived iPSCs for personalized medicine, and utilize multi-omics approaches to further understand cancer heterogeneity and improve treatment outcomes.

Journal of Cancer and Tumor InternationalVol. 14(4)
Abia State University (NG), University of Nigeria (NG), University of Jos (NG), University of Cross River State (NG), University of Benin (NG), Ebonyi State University (NG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.