Effects of intensity on emotion regulation strategy preferences are emotion-specific

Abstract Adaptive emotion regulation is characterized by the ability to flexibly select and switch between different strategies, depending on individual and contextual factors. Previous studies have shown that people prefer disengagement strategies to regulate more intense emotions, while they prefer engagement strategies to regulate less intense emotions. In this study, we investigated whether – in addition to the intensity of emotions – the discrete emotion type (disgust versus fear) also affects emotion regulation strategy preferences. A total of 401 students from three different universities completed an emotion regulation choice task in which they could choose between distraction and reappraisal to regulate their emotions in response to viewing high versus low intensity disgust- and fear-evoking pictures. We found that strategy choices did indeed depend on the nature of specific emotions, with distraction being preferred for regulating disgust, and reappraisal being preferred for regulating fear. Crucially, the nature of the emotion also qualified the previously reported effect of emotion intensity on strategy choice: Only for disgust- but not for fear-evoking pictures did participants show an increased preference for distraction over reappraisal with increased emotion intensity. Our results thus show that the effects of emotional intensity on emotion regulation strategy choice are emotion-specific and indicate that factors affecting emotion regulation strategy choice interact with each other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10093-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of intensity on emotion regulation strategy preferences are emotion-specific

Patrick Clarke, Julie L. Ji, Lies Notebaert, Bram Van Bockstaele et al.
2 citations
Motivation and Emotion
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
1.28
article

Effects of intensity on emotion regulation strategy preferences are emotion-specific

Patrick Clarke, Julie L. Ji, Lies Notebaert, Bram Van Bockstaele, Nigel T. M. Chen, Jemma Todd, Daniel Rudaizky, Frances Meeten, Julian Basanovic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Adaptive emotion regulation is characterized by the ability to flexibly select and switch between different strategies, depending on individual and contextual factors. Previous studies have shown that people prefer disengagement strategies to regulate more intense emotions, while they prefer engagement strategies to regulate less intense emotions. In this study, we investigated whether – in addition to the intensity of emotions – the discrete emotion type (disgust versus fear) also affects emotion regulation strategy preferences. A total of 401 students from three different universities completed an emotion regulation choice task in which they could choose between distraction and reappraisal to regulate their emotions in response to viewing high versus low intensity disgust- and fear-evoking pictures. We found that strategy choices did indeed depend on the nature of specific emotions, with distraction being preferred for regulating disgust, and reappraisal being preferred for regulating fear. Crucially, the nature of the emotion also qualified the previously reported effect of emotion intensity on strategy choice: Only for disgust- but not for fear-evoking pictures did participants show an increased preference for distraction over reappraisal with increased emotion intensity. Our results thus show that the effects of emotional intensity on emotion regulation strategy choice are emotion-specific and indicate that factors affecting emotion regulation strategy choice interact with each other.

Motivation and EmotionVol. 48(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Sussex (GB), The University of Western Australia (AU), King's College London (GB), Curtin University (AU), University of Exeter (GB), Ghent University (BE), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Plymouth (GB)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.