Teaching experience for process identification using first‐order‐plus‐time‐delay models

Abstract This paper introduces an instructional framework for process identification, combining theoretical concepts with practical laboratory exercises, focusing particularly on the identification of first‐order‐plus‐time‐delay models. Our methodology emphasizes guiding students through the various stages involved in the system identification process, namely mastering techniques, such as data acquisition and preprocessing, identification and validation stages, and method comparison. The laboratory assignment is structured into three distinct stages: an initial prelab task working with simulated data, the hands‐on work with laboratory equipment, and the assignment report writing and oral presentation. The assessment of students' learning outcomes is conducted using a detailed rubric. Feedback from a focus group interview indicates that the majority of students appreciated the well‐balanced content, highlighting a strong link between theoretical concepts and practical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22794
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching experience for process identification using first‐order‐plus‐time‐delay models

Nourdine Aliane
1 citations
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.33
article

Teaching experience for process identification using first‐order‐plus‐time‐delay models

Nourdine Aliane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper introduces an instructional framework for process identification, combining theoretical concepts with practical laboratory exercises, focusing particularly on the identification of first‐order‐plus‐time‐delay models. Our methodology emphasizes guiding students through the various stages involved in the system identification process, namely mastering techniques, such as data acquisition and preprocessing, identification and validation stages, and method comparison. The laboratory assignment is structured into three distinct stages: an initial prelab task working with simulated data, the hands‐on work with laboratory equipment, and the assignment report writing and oral presentation. The assessment of students' learning outcomes is conducted using a detailed rubric. Feedback from a focus group interview indicates that the majority of students appreciated the well‐balanced content, highlighting a strong link between theoretical concepts and practical application.

Computer Applications in Engineering EducationVol. 32(6)
Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.