Generative AI detection in higher education assessments

Abstract This chapter presents a critical analysis of generative AI (GenAI) detection tools in higher education assessments. The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of GenAI, particularly in education, necessitates a reevaluation of traditional academic integrity mechanisms. I explore the effectiveness, vulnerabilities, and ethical implications of AI detection tools in the context of preserving academic integrity. My analysis synthesizes insights from various case studies, newspaper articles, and student testimonies to scrutinize the practical and philosophical challenges associated with AI detection. I argue that reliance on detection mechanisms is misaligned with the educational landscape, where AI plays an increasing role. I advocate for a strategic shift toward robust assessment methods and educational policies that embrace GenAI usage while ensuring academic integrity and authenticity in assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Teaching and Learning
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20624
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI detection in higher education assessments

Cesare Giulio Ardito
29 citations
New Directions for Teaching and Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.49
article

Generative AI detection in higher education assessments

Cesare Giulio Ardito
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter presents a critical analysis of generative AI (GenAI) detection tools in higher education assessments. The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of GenAI, particularly in education, necessitates a reevaluation of traditional academic integrity mechanisms. I explore the effectiveness, vulnerabilities, and ethical implications of AI detection tools in the context of preserving academic integrity. My analysis synthesizes insights from various case studies, newspaper articles, and student testimonies to scrutinize the practical and philosophical challenges associated with AI detection. I argue that reliance on detection mechanisms is misaligned with the educational landscape, where AI plays an increasing role. I advocate for a strategic shift toward robust assessment methods and educational policies that embrace GenAI usage while ensuring academic integrity and authenticity in assessments.

New Directions for Teaching and LearningVol. 2025(182)
University of Manchester (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI detection in higher education assessments — Cesare Giulio Ardito · New Directions for Teaching and Learning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS