Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria

Laboratory benchmarking allows objective analysis of the analytical performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We present the analytical detection limits of the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII), and two best-in-class WHO-prequalified comparator RDTs, generated using standardized panels containing recombinant antigen, in vitro cultured parasites, international standards, and clinical samples. Detection limit antigen concentrations of HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH were determined for the Rapigen and comparator RDTs. Detection of antigens in international units (IU)/mL was also evaluated. The Rapigen Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII) detected 3.9 and 3.9 IU/mL for PfLDH and HRP2, respectively, and the Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) detected 3.9 and 5.0 IU/mL for PfLDH and PvLDH, respectively. The comparator HRP2/PfLDH and HRP2/PvLDH detected 15.6 and 31.3 IU/mL for HRP2 and PfLDH and 15.6 and 50.0 IU/mL for HRP2 and PvLDH, respectively. The RDT clinical sensitivity was predicted through application of analytical detection limits to antigen concentration distributions from clinical symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Febrile cases would be detected in a majority by both standard and Rapigen RDTs, but incremental increases in sensitivity in the Rapigen RDTs may be important for clinical cases currently missed by microscopy. Rapigen RDTs were predicted to have improved detection of asymptomatic cases and infections with parasites carrying hrp2 deletions through more sensitive PfLDH detection. Through the benchmarking and simulation of clinical sensitivity, a method for rapidly assessing the ability of new RDTs to meet clinical needs using high-sensitivity antigen distribution data is presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0003
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria

Davis Ropafadzo Mumbengegwi, Dionicia Gamboa, Gonzalo J. Domingo, Allison Golden et al.
10 citations
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Malaria Research and Control
5.43
article

Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria

Davis Ropafadzo Mumbengegwi, Dionicia Gamboa, Gonzalo J. Domingo, Allison Golden, Issaka Sagara, Mallika Imwong, Thanh G. Phan, Ihn Kyung Jang, Andrew Rashid, Katherine Torres, Henry Ntuku, Patrick E. Duffy, Hannah Slater, Sean C. Murphy, Rebecca Barney, James McCarthy, Greg T. Bizilj, John Rek, Michelle S. Hsiang, Sara A. Healy, Sayali Walke, Smita Das, Jordi Landier, Francois Nosten, Jennifer Hume, Melissa J. Rist
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Laboratory benchmarking allows objective analysis of the analytical performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We present the analytical detection limits of the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII), and two best-in-class WHO-prequalified comparator RDTs, generated using standardized panels containing recombinant antigen, in vitro cultured parasites, international standards, and clinical samples. Detection limit antigen concentrations of HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH were determined for the Rapigen and comparator RDTs. Detection of antigens in international units (IU)/mL was also evaluated. The Rapigen Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII) detected 3.9 and 3.9 IU/mL for PfLDH and HRP2, respectively, and the Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) detected 3.9 and 5.0 IU/mL for PfLDH and PvLDH, respectively. The comparator HRP2/PfLDH and HRP2/PvLDH detected 15.6 and 31.3 IU/mL for HRP2 and PfLDH and 15.6 and 50.0 IU/mL for HRP2 and PvLDH, respectively. The RDT clinical sensitivity was predicted through application of analytical detection limits to antigen concentration distributions from clinical symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Febrile cases would be detected in a majority by both standard and Rapigen RDTs, but incremental increases in sensitivity in the Rapigen RDTs may be important for clinical cases currently missed by microscopy. Rapigen RDTs were predicted to have improved detection of asymptomatic cases and infections with parasites carrying hrp2 deletions through more sensitive PfLDH detection. Through the benchmarking and simulation of clinical sensitivity, a method for rapidly assessing the ability of new RDTs to meet clinical needs using high-sensitivity antigen distribution data is presented.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneVol. 111(5)
National Institutes of Health (US), Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (US), Inserm (FR), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of California, San Francisco (US), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE), University of Washington (US), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), University of Namibia (NA), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Mahidol University (TH), University of Oxford (GB), Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (TH), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (ML), Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (UG), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US), Economic & Social Sciences, Health Systems & Medical Informatics (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Malaria Research and Control
5.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.