Effectiveness of Machine Learning in Predicting Orthodontic Tooth Extractions: A Multi-Institutional Study

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning in predicting whether orthodontic patients would require extraction or non-extraction treatment using data from two university datasets. A total of 1135 patients, with 297 from University 1 and 838 from University 2, were included during consecutive enrollment periods. The study identified 20 inputs including 9 clinical features and 11 cephalometric measurements based on previous research. Random forest (RF) models were used to make predictions for both institutions. The performance of each model was assessed using sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), accuracy (ACC), and feature ranking. The model trained on the combined data from two universities demonstrated the highest performance, achieving 50% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 85% accuracy. When cross-predicting, where the University 1 (U1) model was applied to the University 2 (U2) data and vice versa, there was a slight decrease in performance metrics (ranging from 0% to 20%). Maxillary and mandibular crowding were identified as the most significant features influencing extraction decisions in both institutions. This study is among the first to utilize datasets from two United States institutions, marking progress toward developing an artificial intelligence model to support orthodontists in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11090888
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Machine Learning in Predicting Orthodontic Tooth Extractions: A Multi-Institutional Study

Ching‐Chang Ko, Tai‐Hsien Wu, Lily Etemad, Camille Guez et al.
8 citations
Bioengineering
Dental Radiography and Imaging
3.95
article

Effectiveness of Machine Learning in Predicting Orthodontic Tooth Extractions: A Multi-Institutional Study

Ching‐Chang Ko, Tai‐Hsien Wu, Lily Etemad, Camille Guez, John P. Heiner, Abdullah Al Amin, Wei‐Lun Chao, Zongyang Sun, Shin-Jung Hsieh
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning in predicting whether orthodontic patients would require extraction or non-extraction treatment using data from two university datasets. A total of 1135 patients, with 297 from University 1 and 838 from University 2, were included during consecutive enrollment periods. The study identified 20 inputs including 9 clinical features and 11 cephalometric measurements based on previous research. Random forest (RF) models were used to make predictions for both institutions. The performance of each model was assessed using sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), accuracy (ACC), and feature ranking. The model trained on the combined data from two universities demonstrated the highest performance, achieving 50% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 85% accuracy. When cross-predicting, where the University 1 (U1) model was applied to the University 2 (U2) data and vice versa, there was a slight decrease in performance metrics (ranging from 0% to 20%). Maxillary and mandibular crowding were identified as the most significant features influencing extraction decisions in both institutions. This study is among the first to utilize datasets from two United States institutions, marking progress toward developing an artificial intelligence model to support orthodontists in clinical practice.

BioengineeringVol. 11(9)
The Ohio State University (US)
Ohio State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
3.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.