Ethical AI in Financial Inclusion: The Role of Algorithmic Fairness on User Satisfaction and Recommendation

This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on financial inclusion satisfaction and recommendation, with a focus on the ethical dimensions and perceived algorithmic fairness. Drawing upon organizational justice theory and the heuristic–systematic model, we examine how algorithm transparency, accountability, and legitimacy influence users’ perceptions of fairness and, subsequently, their satisfaction with and likelihood to recommend AI-driven financial inclusion services. Through a survey-based quantitative analysis of 675 users in China, our results reveal that perceived algorithmic fairness acts as a significant mediating factor between the ethical attributes of AI systems and the user responses. Specifically, higher levels of transparency, accountability, and legitimacy enhance users’ perceptions of fairness, which, in turn, significantly increases both their satisfaction with AI-facilitated financial inclusion services and their likelihood to recommend them. This research contributes to the literature on AI ethics by empirically demonstrating the critical role of transparent, accountable, and legitimate AI practices in fostering positive user outcomes. Moreover, it addresses a significant gap in the understanding of the ethical implications of AI in financial inclusion contexts, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in this rapidly evolving field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8090105
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical AI in Financial Inclusion: The Role of Algorithmic Fairness on User Satisfaction and Recommendation

Young‐Chan Lee, Qin Yang
11 citations
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
5.79
article

Ethical AI in Financial Inclusion: The Role of Algorithmic Fairness on User Satisfaction and Recommendation

Young‐Chan Lee, Qin Yang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on financial inclusion satisfaction and recommendation, with a focus on the ethical dimensions and perceived algorithmic fairness. Drawing upon organizational justice theory and the heuristic–systematic model, we examine how algorithm transparency, accountability, and legitimacy influence users’ perceptions of fairness and, subsequently, their satisfaction with and likelihood to recommend AI-driven financial inclusion services. Through a survey-based quantitative analysis of 675 users in China, our results reveal that perceived algorithmic fairness acts as a significant mediating factor between the ethical attributes of AI systems and the user responses. Specifically, higher levels of transparency, accountability, and legitimacy enhance users’ perceptions of fairness, which, in turn, significantly increases both their satisfaction with AI-facilitated financial inclusion services and their likelihood to recommend them. This research contributes to the literature on AI ethics by empirically demonstrating the critical role of transparent, accountable, and legitimate AI practices in fostering positive user outcomes. Moreover, it addresses a significant gap in the understanding of the ethical implications of AI in financial inclusion contexts, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in this rapidly evolving field.

Big Data and Cognitive ComputingVol. 8(9)
Dongguk University (KR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
5.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.