Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. <i>In Vitro</i> Study
<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the ablation speed (AS), laser efficiency and direct thermal lesions during urinary stone lithotripsy with the current available laser technologies: Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG), pulsed-Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) <i>in vitro</i> using different laser settings. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Ho:YAG, p-Tm:YAG, and TFL laser system were used in an <i>in vitro</i> ureteral model with a volume of 125 mm<sup>3</sup> Begostone. The following parameters were tested across all laser devices: 0.6J/10 Hz (6 W), 0.6 J/20 Hz (12 W), 1.5 J/10 Hz (15 W), and 1.5 J/20 Hz (30 W), employing short pulse width for all lasers and long pulse width for Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Ten participants conducted the experimental setup during 3-minutes laser on time, combining the laser technology, settings, and pulse widths, with a total of 20 different combinations. The efficiency, AS and ureteral damage resulting from each intervention were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> p-Tm:YAG and TFL demonstrated significantly higher efficiency compared with Ho:YAG (0.049 ± 0.02 Δgr/KJ and 0.042 ± 0.01 Δgr/KJ <i>vs</i> 0.029 ± 0.01 Δgr/KJ; <i>p</i> < 0.05). In all laser sources, as the power increases, the AS also increases (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, only at high-energy settings (1.5 J) higher frequency led to increase AS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Both, p-Tm:YAG and TFL exhibited higher AS compared to Ho:YAG (0.64 ± 0.33 Δgr/s and 0.62 ± 0.31 Δgr/s <i>vs</i> 0.44 ± 0.22 Δgr/s; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Regarding ureteral injuries, as the power increases, there is a higher chance of ureteral damage (<i>p</i> = 0.031). No differences were observed between laser technologies (<i>p</i> = 0.828). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Both, p-Tm:YAG and TFL exhibited superior performances during laser lithotripsy compared with Ho:YAG, as they demonstrated higher efficiency and ablation speed. Thermal damage did not appear to be associated with specific laser equipment, but higher grades of lesions are described by increasing power.
Authors
- Carmen E. Castillo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9549-559X)
- Alba Sierra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2474-8067)
- Olivier Traxer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-3803)
- Asier Mercadé
- Frédéric Panthier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-2984)
- Lluís Peri
- Antonio Alcaraz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-5250)
- Juan Manuel López (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1834-080X)
- Pilar Luqué (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8476-1395)
Institutions
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Hôpital Tenon (FR)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Endourology
- Published
- 2024-09-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0349
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.35