Forecasting Costs of U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Against a Major Nuclear Strike

How many dollars would the United States need to spend on its ballistic missile defense (BMD) for each dollar the attacker spends to launch land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) armed with nuclear warheads? A hypothetical scenario is analyzed in which the United States has a functioning BMD technology and enough interceptors to distribute them in a two-layer defense with the overall system efficiency of 90%, as targeted by U.S. war planners. It is assumed that the attacker has enough missiles to deliver a range between 500 and 6000 warheads to the continental United States. Results show that in the most optimistic case for the defender, with a very high individual interceptor kill effectiveness of 90% and with perfect decoy discrimination capability, the United States would need to spend on average 8 times more than the attacker, for a total cost between $60 billion and $500 billion. With a more realistic individual interceptor effectiveness of 50% and if the system is unable to discriminate against decoys, the United States would need to spend on average 70 times more, for a total cost between $430 billion and $5.3 trillion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Defence and Peace Economics
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2024.2396415
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting Costs of U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Against a Major Nuclear Strike

Igor Morić, Timur Kadyshev
5 citations
Defence and Peace Economics
Nuclear Issues and Defense
11.16
article

Forecasting Costs of U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Against a Major Nuclear Strike

Igor Morić, Timur Kadyshev
article en
5 citations

Abstract

How many dollars would the United States need to spend on its ballistic missile defense (BMD) for each dollar the attacker spends to launch land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) armed with nuclear warheads? A hypothetical scenario is analyzed in which the United States has a functioning BMD technology and enough interceptors to distribute them in a two-layer defense with the overall system efficiency of 90%, as targeted by U.S. war planners. It is assumed that the attacker has enough missiles to deliver a range between 500 and 6000 warheads to the continental United States. Results show that in the most optimistic case for the defender, with a very high individual interceptor kill effectiveness of 90% and with perfect decoy discrimination capability, the United States would need to spend on average 8 times more than the attacker, for a total cost between $60 billion and $500 billion. With a more realistic individual interceptor effectiveness of 50% and if the system is unable to discriminate against decoys, the United States would need to spend on average 70 times more, for a total cost between $430 billion and $5.3 trillion.

Defence and Peace EconomicsVol. 36(2)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Princeton University (US), Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
11.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forecasting Costs of U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Against a Major Nuclear Strike — Igor Morić, Timur Kadyshev · Defence and Peace Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS