Anthropogenic modification of a giant ground sloth tooth from Brazil supported by a multi-disciplinary approach

Identifying evidence of human modification of extinct animal remains, such as Pleistocene megafauna, is challenging due to the similarity of anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic taphonomic features observed under optical microscopy. Here, we re-investigate a Late Pleistocene ground sloth tooth from northeast Brazil, previously suggested as human-modified based only on optical observation. To characterize the macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the marks preserved in this tooth and evaluate potential human modification, we used stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) supplemented by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), UV photoluminescence (UV/PL), synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence (SR-XRF), and synchrotron micro-computed tomography (SR-µCT). These methods allowed us to discriminate non-anthropogenic taphonomic features (root and sedimentary damage), anthropogenic marks, and histological features. The latter shows the infiltration of exogenous elements into the dentine from the sediments. Our evidence demonstrates the sequence of anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic taphonomic modification of this tooth and supports its initial intentional modification by humans. We highlight the benefits of emerging imaging and spectral imaging techniques to investigate and diagnose human modification in fossil and archaeological records and propose that human modification of tooth tissues should be further considered when studying possibly anthropogenically altered fossil remains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69145-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropogenic modification of a giant ground sloth tooth from Brazil supported by a multi-disciplinary approach

Lidiane Asevedo, Thaís Rabito Pansani, Mário André Trindade Dantas, Anna K. Behrensmeyer et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
5.85
article

Anthropogenic modification of a giant ground sloth tooth from Brazil supported by a multi-disciplinary approach

Lidiane Asevedo, Thaís Rabito Pansani, Mário André Trindade Dantas, Anna K. Behrensmeyer, Andrew King, Mathieu Thoury, Briana Pobiner, Sebastian Schöder, Loïc Bertrand, Mírian Liza Alves Forancelli Pacheco, Hermínio Ismael de Araújo-Júnior
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Identifying evidence of human modification of extinct animal remains, such as Pleistocene megafauna, is challenging due to the similarity of anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic taphonomic features observed under optical microscopy. Here, we re-investigate a Late Pleistocene ground sloth tooth from northeast Brazil, previously suggested as human-modified based only on optical observation. To characterize the macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the marks preserved in this tooth and evaluate potential human modification, we used stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) supplemented by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), UV photoluminescence (UV/PL), synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence (SR-XRF), and synchrotron micro-computed tomography (SR-µCT). These methods allowed us to discriminate non-anthropogenic taphonomic features (root and sedimentary damage), anthropogenic marks, and histological features. The latter shows the infiltration of exogenous elements into the dentine from the sediments. Our evidence demonstrates the sequence of anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic taphonomic modification of this tooth and supports its initial intentional modification by humans. We highlight the benefits of emerging imaging and spectral imaging techniques to investigate and diagnose human modification in fossil and archaeological records and propose that human modification of tooth tissues should be further considered when studying possibly anthropogenically altered fossil remains.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Smithsonian Institution (US), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), National Museum of Natural History (US), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Synchrotron soleil (FR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Institut photonique d'analyse non-destructive européen des matériaux anciens (FR)
Smithsonian Institution, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais, Laboratório Nacional de Biociências
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
5.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.