“Cameras Help, but Hurt”: The Role and Use of Prison Cameras for Accountability

The context of the carceral environment is based on the logic of surveillance and relies on cameras to act as the ever-present eyes of the institution. We explore the investigative roles that cameras play in the institution from the perspective of correctional staff and residents. A qualitative study was conducted in a medium-security institution in the Midwest region of the United States as part of the Prison Research and Innovation Initiative (PRII). The findings are based on semi-structured interviews with people who are incarcerated and correctional staff (including custody and noncustody staff). Upholding accountability was a perceived benefit of reviewing footage from prison cameras during investigations, yet the harms of selective enforcement against the resident population and the perceived misuse of cameras for staff disciplinary actions thwarted the benefits of having and using cameras.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862241272333
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Cameras Help, but Hurt”: The Role and Use of Prison Cameras for Accountability

Victoria Inzana, Beth M. Huebner, Ashley Givens, Kelli E. Canada et al.
1 citations
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
1.13
article

“Cameras Help, but Hurt”: The Role and Use of Prison Cameras for Accountability

Victoria Inzana, Beth M. Huebner, Ashley Givens, Kelli E. Canada, Elizabeth Taylor, Janet Garcia-Hallett, Jasmine Kaur
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The context of the carceral environment is based on the logic of surveillance and relies on cameras to act as the ever-present eyes of the institution. We explore the investigative roles that cameras play in the institution from the perspective of correctional staff and residents. A qualitative study was conducted in a medium-security institution in the Midwest region of the United States as part of the Prison Research and Innovation Initiative (PRII). The findings are based on semi-structured interviews with people who are incarcerated and correctional staff (including custody and noncustody staff). Upholding accountability was a perceived benefit of reviewing footage from prison cameras during investigations, yet the harms of selective enforcement against the resident population and the perceived misuse of cameras for staff disciplinary actions thwarted the benefits of having and using cameras.

Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeVol. 40(4)
University of Missouri–St. Louis (US), University of New Haven (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.