Comparative Study of Pre-Trained Models for Breast Cancer Classification: Challenges and Future Directions

Accurately diagnosing breast cancer through histopathological images is crucial for making the right treatment decisions.In this study, the performance of three pre -trained deep learning models-MobileNetV2, ResNet50, and DenseNet121 was evaluated in classifying breast tumor images from the BreakHis dataset as benign or malignant.We calculated detailed metrics such as accuracy, AUC -ROC, and Cohen's Kappa for assessment.DenseNet121 stood out, achieving a test accuracy of 99.93%, a perfect AUC -ROC of 1.0, and a Cohen's Kappa score of 0. 9984, demonstrating its strong ability to differentiate between benign and malignant cases. MobileNetV2 is known for its efficiency and balanced accuracy with resource usage, making it a solid choice for resource -limited environments. The performance of DenseNet121 was statistically confirmed to be significantly better than ResNet50, indicating its potential usefulness in clinical settings where high precision is essential. However, this study did not address the class imbalance in the dataset, which could affect the results. Future research will address this imbalance to enhance model performance further and contribute to developing effective, resource -efficient deep learning models for medical image analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/sr24830204827
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Pre-Trained Models for Breast Cancer Classification: Challenges and Future Directions

Cibaca Khandelwal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
AI in cancer detection
article

Comparative Study of Pre-Trained Models for Breast Cancer Classification: Challenges and Future Directions

Cibaca Khandelwal
article en

Abstract

Accurately diagnosing breast cancer through histopathological images is crucial for making the right treatment decisions.In this study, the performance of three pre -trained deep learning models-MobileNetV2, ResNet50, and DenseNet121 was evaluated in classifying breast tumor images from the BreakHis dataset as benign or malignant.We calculated detailed metrics such as accuracy, AUC -ROC, and Cohen's Kappa for assessment.DenseNet121 stood out, achieving a test accuracy of 99.93%, a perfect AUC -ROC of 1.0, and a Cohen's Kappa score of 0. 9984, demonstrating its strong ability to differentiate between benign and malignant cases. MobileNetV2 is known for its efficiency and balanced accuracy with resource usage, making it a solid choice for resource -limited environments. The performance of DenseNet121 was statistically confirmed to be significantly better than ResNet50, indicating its potential usefulness in clinical settings where high precision is essential. However, this study did not address the class imbalance in the dataset, which could affect the results. Future research will address this imbalance to enhance model performance further and contribute to developing effective, resource -efficient deep learning models for medical image analysis.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 13(9)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study of Pre-Trained Models for Breast Cancer Classification: Challenges and Future Directions — Cibaca Khandelwal · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS