Lung function at 1-year follow-up in patients with persistent dyspnea after mild COVID-19 – comparisons with moderate and critical COVID-19

Aim: To assess lung function in patients with persistent dyspnea 1 year after mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and compare with those hospitalized with moderate or critical COVID-19. Methods: Adults with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection with mild COVID-19 and persistent dyspnea (n = 18) or with moderate (n = 34) or critical COVID-19 (n = 19) were followed up 11–13 months after initial infection. Inclusion criteria were age < 65 years, no smoking history, and no preexisting respiratory diseases. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and patients underwent spirometry and measurement of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Results: The non-hospitalized patients were significantly younger and more often female compared with those in the moderate and critical groups (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in comorbidities or body mass index (BMI) were noted between severity groups. An obstructive spirometry pattern (ratio of forced expiratory volume during the first exhalation second to forced vital capacity under the lower limit of normal (LLN)) was found in 5.6, 5.9, and 5.3% of patients in the mild, moderate, and critical groups, respectively (P = 0.995). Abnormal DLCO (< LLN) rates were seen in 5.6, 16.7, and 47.4% in the mild, moderate, and critical groups, respectively (P = 0.018). DLCO, expressed as a z-score, was significantly lower in the critical group compared with the mild group after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. Conclusion: Only a few subjects with mild COVID-19 and persistent dyspnea had abnormal lung function 1 year after initial infection, assessed based on spirometry and DLCO measurements. An obstructive spirometry pattern at 1-year follow-up was uncommon even in patients with moderate or critical COVID-19. Impaired DLCO was more common in patients with critical COVID-19.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v129.10740
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung function at 1-year follow-up in patients with persistent dyspnea after mild COVID-19 – comparisons with moderate and critical COVID-19

Helena Janols, Emil Ekbom, Andreï Malinovschi, Michael Hultström et al.
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Lung function at 1-year follow-up in patients with persistent dyspnea after mild COVID-19 – comparisons with moderate and critical COVID-19

Helena Janols, Emil Ekbom, Andreï Malinovschi, Michael Hultström, Miklós Lipcsey, Carl-Johan Neiderud, Marta Alina Kisiel, Robert Frithiof, Gabriel Westman
article en

Abstract

Aim: To assess lung function in patients with persistent dyspnea 1 year after mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and compare with those hospitalized with moderate or critical COVID-19. Methods: Adults with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection with mild COVID-19 and persistent dyspnea (n = 18) or with moderate (n = 34) or critical COVID-19 (n = 19) were followed up 11–13 months after initial infection. Inclusion criteria were age < 65 years, no smoking history, and no preexisting respiratory diseases. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and patients underwent spirometry and measurement of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Results: The non-hospitalized patients were significantly younger and more often female compared with those in the moderate and critical groups (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in comorbidities or body mass index (BMI) were noted between severity groups. An obstructive spirometry pattern (ratio of forced expiratory volume during the first exhalation second to forced vital capacity under the lower limit of normal (LLN)) was found in 5.6, 5.9, and 5.3% of patients in the mild, moderate, and critical groups, respectively (P = 0.995). Abnormal DLCO (< LLN) rates were seen in 5.6, 16.7, and 47.4% in the mild, moderate, and critical groups, respectively (P = 0.018). DLCO, expressed as a z-score, was significantly lower in the critical group compared with the mild group after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. Conclusion: Only a few subjects with mild COVID-19 and persistent dyspnea had abnormal lung function 1 year after initial infection, assessed based on spirometry and DLCO measurements. An obstructive spirometry pattern at 1-year follow-up was uncommon even in patients with moderate or critical COVID-19. Impaired DLCO was more common in patients with critical COVID-19.

Upsala Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 129
Uppsala University (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.