Whether the potential degree of cervical instability and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylosis radicular affect the efficacy of cervical traction

To explore whether the potential instability of the cervical spine and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) affect the efficacy of cervical traction, and whether cervical traction can aggravate the potential instability of the cervical spine. We divided the 113 recruited CRS patients into three groups based on the differences in horizontal displacement and abnormal angle, and measured the degree of cervical muscle degeneration in the patients through MRI. Considering functional scores, VAS, NDI and PCS scores of the three groups post-treatment were significantly improved. Through the intergroup analysis, we found that the improvement in functional scores in the mild and moderate instability trend groups was better than that in the severe group. Through MRI measurements, we found that the degree of cervical muscle degeneration was significantly increased in the severe instability trend group. Regarding the changes in X-Ray imaging parameters pre- and post-treatment, no significant differences were observed pre- and post-treatment. For patients with CSR, the more serious their predisposition for cervical instability was, the more severe the degree of cervical muscle degeneration was, which means the worse the curative effect was, but cervical traction did not aggravate the potential degree of cervical instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71429-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whether the potential degree of cervical instability and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylosis radicular affect the efficacy of cervical traction

Linquan Zhou, Zhongyu Xiao, Rongcan Wu, Dehui Chen et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
1.15
article

Whether the potential degree of cervical instability and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylosis radicular affect the efficacy of cervical traction

Linquan Zhou, Zhongyu Xiao, Rongcan Wu, Dehui Chen, Zhitao Shangguan, Zhenyu Wang, Wenge Liu, Taotao Lin, Yujie Zhao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To explore whether the potential instability of the cervical spine and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) affect the efficacy of cervical traction, and whether cervical traction can aggravate the potential instability of the cervical spine. We divided the 113 recruited CRS patients into three groups based on the differences in horizontal displacement and abnormal angle, and measured the degree of cervical muscle degeneration in the patients through MRI. Considering functional scores, VAS, NDI and PCS scores of the three groups post-treatment were significantly improved. Through the intergroup analysis, we found that the improvement in functional scores in the mild and moderate instability trend groups was better than that in the severe group. Through MRI measurements, we found that the degree of cervical muscle degeneration was significantly increased in the severe instability trend group. Regarding the changes in X-Ray imaging parameters pre- and post-treatment, no significant differences were observed pre- and post-treatment. For patients with CSR, the more serious their predisposition for cervical instability was, the more severe the degree of cervical muscle degeneration was, which means the worse the curative effect was, but cervical traction did not aggravate the potential degree of cervical instability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.