Employee disengagement: the catalytic role of leader-induced defensive cognitions and perceptual politics
Purpose The study aims to attain insights into the role of destructive leadership and perceived organizational politics as catalysts for employee disengagement through the perspective of social identity theory. The research further considers employees’ defensive cognitions for a comprehensive understanding of these interrelated phenomena in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach In order to ascertain the pertinence and contextual relevance of the proposed framework, literary review was complemented by a survey-based study encompassing 114 full-time employees purposively selected from the six systemically important banks of Pakistan. Findings The findings accentuate the significance of destructive leadership in inducing withdrawal behaviours among employees directly and indirectly through continuance commitment. The results also underline perceptions of politics as a significant work environment impediment amplifying employees’ propensity to undergo psychological withdrawal. Originality/value The study contributes to strategic human resource management literature by offering an identity-based explanation for employees’ disengagement, considering Pakistan’s power-distant and collectivist orientation. The research further introduces an empirical novelty by postulating a total effect moderation model.
Authors
- Muhammad Zohaib Tahir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8994-2110)
- Aamer Waheed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5984-6600)
- Farooq Mughal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2522-7944)
- Tahir Mumtaz Awan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-2277)
Institutions
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- University of Bath (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Management Development
- Published
- 2024-09-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-04-2024-0138
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.35