Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice

Despite a growing effort in recent years to theorize epistemic justice as a species of distributive justice from within a Rawlsian framework, there is as yet no well-worked out capabilities-based account. In this paper, we set out to provide one. According to our sufficientarian conception, epistemic justice requires a distribution of capabilities that ensures to all individuals opportunities for minimal epistemic agency, publicly conceived. We argue that this conception has advantages over existing resourcist accounts of distributive epistemic justice inspired by Rawls as well as over Miranda Fricker’s tentative capabilities-based alternative. We contend that epistemic justice concerns a plurality of capabilities for epistemic agency, where the scope and nature of these capabilities is ultimately left open to discernment through public reasoning, but where equal emphasis is placed on contributing as well as retrieving epistemic goods and resources from common pools and on exerting combined capabilities as well as developing internal ones in the first place.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Epistemology
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2024.2392130
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice

Sasha Mudd, Hernán Bobadilla
2 citations
Social Epistemology
Political Philosophy and Ethics
4.46
article

Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice

Sasha Mudd, Hernán Bobadilla
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite a growing effort in recent years to theorize epistemic justice as a species of distributive justice from within a Rawlsian framework, there is as yet no well-worked out capabilities-based account. In this paper, we set out to provide one. According to our sufficientarian conception, epistemic justice requires a distribution of capabilities that ensures to all individuals opportunities for minimal epistemic agency, publicly conceived. We argue that this conception has advantages over existing resourcist accounts of distributive epistemic justice inspired by Rawls as well as over Miranda Fricker’s tentative capabilities-based alternative. We contend that epistemic justice concerns a plurality of capabilities for epistemic agency, where the scope and nature of these capabilities is ultimately left open to discernment through public reasoning, but where equal emphasis is placed on contributing as well as retrieving epistemic goods and resources from common pools and on exerting combined capabilities as well as developing internal ones in the first place.

Social Epistemology
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice — Sasha Mudd, Hernán Bobadilla · Social Epistemology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS