Sale of disputed rights: Selling the Krooka as a model (A comparative study)

This study aims to clarify the Islamic legal ruling on the sale of disputed rights in Islamic jurisprudence and civil laws in Arab countries. The study focused on a phenomenon that has begun to spread among people, which involves the owner of a "Krooka" selling it to a lawyer for a certain amount so that the lawyer can replace him in claiming financial compensation from the insurance company, either due to the owner's unwillingness to wait for the compensation or his disagreement with the compensation determined by the insurance companies. The study concluded that this sale is not permissible, as it falls under the category of selling a debt to someone other than the debtor, which the majority of jurists consider impermissible. The study made several recommendations, including that the Bar Association should take deterrent measures against lawyers who engage in such transactions and that insurance companies should improve their performance so that policyholders are not compelled to deal with these speculators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59759/jjis.v20i3.538
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sale of disputed rights: Selling the Krooka as a model (A comparative study)

Hayel Dawood, Nour Alkhateeb
Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies
European and International Contract Law
article

Sale of disputed rights: Selling the Krooka as a model (A comparative study)

Hayel Dawood, Nour Alkhateeb
article en

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the Islamic legal ruling on the sale of disputed rights in Islamic jurisprudence and civil laws in Arab countries. The study focused on a phenomenon that has begun to spread among people, which involves the owner of a "Krooka" selling it to a lawyer for a certain amount so that the lawyer can replace him in claiming financial compensation from the insurance company, either due to the owner's unwillingness to wait for the compensation or his disagreement with the compensation determined by the insurance companies. The study concluded that this sale is not permissible, as it falls under the category of selling a debt to someone other than the debtor, which the majority of jurists consider impermissible. The study made several recommendations, including that the Bar Association should take deterrent measures against lawyers who engage in such transactions and that insurance companies should improve their performance so that policyholders are not compelled to deal with these speculators.

Jordan Journal of Islamic StudiesVol. 20(3)
University of Jordan (JO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sale of disputed rights: Selling the Krooka as a model (A comparative study) — Hayel Dawood, Nour Alkhateeb · Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS