Semantic validation of nursing outcome dry eye severity in intensive care
Objective: To semantically validate the indicators of the nursing outcome Dry Eye Severity in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: Methodological study of semantic validation developed with 15 nurses from an adult general ICU of a public university hospital located in the Northeast of Brazil. Data collection took place between the months of February and April 2019. For data analysis, the Kappa test was used with a value equal to or greater than 85% agreement. A value of p<0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance when the proportion was less than 85%. Results: After evaluating the nurses in relation to the constitutive and operational definitions and operational magnitudes of the indicators, all presented agreement ≥ 0.85. As all indicators that presented statistically significant p values (p < 0.05) presented a cutoff point with perfect agreement, all were admitted. In addition, the nurses' comments and suggestions were taken into account for the final version of the analysis. Conclusion: In the general evaluation of the NO Dry Eye Severity by the nurses, it was...
Authors
- Allyne Fortes Vítor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-2303)
- Mércio Gabriel de Araújo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-4135)
- Amanda Barbosa da Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-7060)
- Ana Clara Dantas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5634-7498)
- Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros Araújo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-1067)
- Marcos Antônio Ferreira Júnior (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-232X)
Institutions
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
- Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Revista de Enfermagem da UFPI
- Published
- 2024-09-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v13i1.4426
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.85