Innovation in Salmon Farming: Enhancing Profitability or Reducing Environmental Hazards?

We analyze the incentives for innovation in salmon farming. To limit environmental hazards, entry into the industry is regulated. The direction of technical change can involve innovations that either enhance profitability or reduce environmental hazards. We then pose the following research question: How should innovation policy be designed to obtain the right balance between profitability-enhancing and environmental-hazard-reducing innovation? Two key results emerge: First, adoption of the latest environmental-hazard-reducing technology should be subsidized or mandated, as the individual salmon farmer does not internalize the positive effect that such adoption has on other farms. Furthermore, regulators should also consider subsidizing environmental-hazard-reducing research and development (R&D), but not profitability-enhancing R&D. With entry regulation, innovators strategically seek to influence the regulator to issue more harvesting licenses. This increases the incentives to perform profitability-enhancing innovation, making subsidies to this kind of innovation superfluous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Resource Economics
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/731773
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation in Salmon Farming: Enhancing Profitability or Reducing Environmental Hazards?

Mads Greaker
2 citations
Marine Resource Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
2.26
article

Innovation in Salmon Farming: Enhancing Profitability or Reducing Environmental Hazards?

Mads Greaker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We analyze the incentives for innovation in salmon farming. To limit environmental hazards, entry into the industry is regulated. The direction of technical change can involve innovations that either enhance profitability or reduce environmental hazards. We then pose the following research question: How should innovation policy be designed to obtain the right balance between profitability-enhancing and environmental-hazard-reducing innovation? Two key results emerge: First, adoption of the latest environmental-hazard-reducing technology should be subsidized or mandated, as the individual salmon farmer does not internalize the positive effect that such adoption has on other farms. Furthermore, regulators should also consider subsidizing environmental-hazard-reducing research and development (R&D), but not profitability-enhancing R&D. With entry regulation, innovators strategically seek to influence the regulator to issue more harvesting licenses. This increases the incentives to perform profitability-enhancing innovation, making subsidies to this kind of innovation superfluous.

Marine Resource EconomicsVol. 39(4)
Metropolitan University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.