Reimagining the global economic order*

A retreat from the post-1990s model of deep economic integration was inevitable and is not necessarily a bad thing. Today’s worries about de-globalization should not blind us to the possibility that the present crisis may in fact produce a better globalization. This essay describes the frailties of the hyper-globalization model and lays out two key prerequisites for the construction of a better global economic order: the prioritization of the domestic social, economic and environmental objectives to build more inclusive societies and polities; and the avoidance of global primacy by major powers. It then discusses the limits of global governance, emphasizing the need to restrict our ambitions with respect to global cooperation to domains where it is most needed and likely to pay dividends. The normative core of the paper is a proposal for a meta-regime for the global economic order that presumes relatively little agreement among countries on desirable economic policies and focuses on minimizing worst cases of adverse cross-border spillovers while building trust (and increased cooperation) over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Keynesian Economics
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2024.03.09
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining the global economic order*

Dani Rodrik
6 citations
Review of Keynesian Economics
Economic Theory and Policy
4.14
article

Reimagining the global economic order*

Dani Rodrik
article en
6 citations

Abstract

A retreat from the post-1990s model of deep economic integration was inevitable and is not necessarily a bad thing. Today’s worries about de-globalization should not blind us to the possibility that the present crisis may in fact produce a better globalization. This essay describes the frailties of the hyper-globalization model and lays out two key prerequisites for the construction of a better global economic order: the prioritization of the domestic social, economic and environmental objectives to build more inclusive societies and polities; and the avoidance of global primacy by major powers. It then discusses the limits of global governance, emphasizing the need to restrict our ambitions with respect to global cooperation to domains where it is most needed and likely to pay dividends. The normative core of the paper is a proposal for a meta-regime for the global economic order that presumes relatively little agreement among countries on desirable economic policies and focuses on minimizing worst cases of adverse cross-border spillovers while building trust (and increased cooperation) over time.

Review of Keynesian EconomicsVol. 12(3)
Harvard University Press (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic Theory and Policy
4.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.