The Owen Gun: Notes on Development & Evolution

This article examines the technical aspects of the controversial developmental history of the Owen sub-machine gun. The history of the gun’s development has been both politicised and mythologised, with the result that relatively little objective analysis of the design process has been undertaken. The author’s examination of documents (including patents, manufacturing data, official documents, and personal letters) and the weapons themselves provides an alternative perspective to these widely disseminated views. This article also addresses the problematic nature of statements made by the gun’s designers and promoters, which are at variance with other information and yet have largely been accepted uncritically in firearms literature. It also seeks to determine, where possible, which elements of the gun were the work of its nominal designer, Evelyn Owen, and which were likely the work of his various collaborators. The role of the Australian Army in the design is also examined in the hope of correcting misconceptions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Armax The Journal of Contemporary Arms
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52357/armax05809
Primary Topic
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Owen Gun: Notes on Development & Evolution

Christopher Scott
Armax The Journal of Contemporary Arms
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
article

The Owen Gun: Notes on Development & Evolution

Christopher Scott
article en

Abstract

This article examines the technical aspects of the controversial developmental history of the Owen sub-machine gun. The history of the gun’s development has been both politicised and mythologised, with the result that relatively little objective analysis of the design process has been undertaken. The author’s examination of documents (including patents, manufacturing data, official documents, and personal letters) and the weapons themselves provides an alternative perspective to these widely disseminated views. This article also addresses the problematic nature of statements made by the gun’s designers and promoters, which are at variance with other information and yet have largely been accepted uncritically in firearms literature. It also seeks to determine, where possible, which elements of the gun were the work of its nominal designer, Evelyn Owen, and which were likely the work of his various collaborators. The role of the Australian Army in the design is also examined in the hope of correcting misconceptions.

Armax The Journal of Contemporary ArmsVol. X(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.