Intelligent faculty evaluation and ranking system based on N-framed plithogenic fuzzy hypersoft set and extended NR-TOPSIS

This paper proposes an intelligent faculty evaluation and ranking system in a fuzzy environment, with a focus on semester-wise evaluation rather than annual evaluation. This approach is warranted because a university’s academic goals may vary across semesters, affecting the selection and weights of performance indicators related to teaching effectiveness, research output, and official responsibilities. To achieve this objective, the authors introduce the concept of N-framed plithogenic hypersoft set (PHSS), where N represents the number of frames or semesters. Three types of N-framed PHSS are introduced, and an efficient rank reversal-free multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely NR-TOPSIS, is extended by embedding N-framed PHSS in the algorithm of NR-TOPSIS, termed as ENR-TOPSIS. The modified algorithm is capable of extracting data from a source file and producing the desired results. The procedure is implemented for faculty evaluation in a double-framed fuzzy environment, and sensitivity analysis is performed for the proposed ENR-TOPSIS. The developed framework combines intelligent systems that are adaptable and contain additional characteristics, making it more versatile and increasing its accuracy and transparency, in line with SDG-4, which focuses on quality education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.08.071
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent faculty evaluation and ranking system based on N-framed plithogenic fuzzy hypersoft set and extended NR-TOPSIS

Nazek Alessa, Usman Afzal, Nauman Raza, Muhammad Rayees Ahmad et al.
4 citations
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
1.96
article

Intelligent faculty evaluation and ranking system based on N-framed plithogenic fuzzy hypersoft set and extended NR-TOPSIS

Nazek Alessa, Usman Afzal, Nauman Raza, Muhammad Rayees Ahmad, Salem Alkhalaf, Fathea M. Osman Birkea, Nader Omer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper proposes an intelligent faculty evaluation and ranking system in a fuzzy environment, with a focus on semester-wise evaluation rather than annual evaluation. This approach is warranted because a university’s academic goals may vary across semesters, affecting the selection and weights of performance indicators related to teaching effectiveness, research output, and official responsibilities. To achieve this objective, the authors introduce the concept of N-framed plithogenic hypersoft set (PHSS), where N represents the number of frames or semesters. Three types of N-framed PHSS are introduced, and an efficient rank reversal-free multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely NR-TOPSIS, is extended by embedding N-framed PHSS in the algorithm of NR-TOPSIS, termed as ENR-TOPSIS. The modified algorithm is capable of extracting data from a source file and producing the desired results. The procedure is implemented for faculty evaluation in a double-framed fuzzy environment, and sensitivity analysis is performed for the proposed ENR-TOPSIS. The developed framework combines intelligent systems that are adaptable and contain additional characteristics, making it more versatile and increasing its accuracy and transparency, in line with SDG-4, which focuses on quality education.

Alexandria Engineering JournalVol. 109
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Northern Border University (SA), Qassim University (SA), University of the Punjab (PK), University of Bisha (SA), Near East University (CY), University of Management and Technology (PK)
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.