Evaluating the accuracy of CEREC intraoral scanners for inlay restorations: impact of adjacent tooth materials

The restorative materials of the adjacent tooth and the type of intraoral scanner affect the accuracy of the intraoral digital impression. The trueness of the digital images of the BC group, obtained by spraying the powder, was comparable to that of the PS group. Among the adjacent restorative materials, zirconia exhibited the lowest trueness. In contrast, PS demonstrated the highest precision among the intraoral scanners, while resin displayed the lowest precision among the adjacent restorative materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04794-6
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the accuracy of CEREC intraoral scanners for inlay restorations: impact of adjacent tooth materials

Jeong‐Kil Park, Sung‐Ae Son, Jae‐Hoon Kim, Yeongjun Kwon
6 citations
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
2.41
article

Evaluating the accuracy of CEREC intraoral scanners for inlay restorations: impact of adjacent tooth materials

Jeong‐Kil Park, Sung‐Ae Son, Jae‐Hoon Kim, Yeongjun Kwon
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The restorative materials of the adjacent tooth and the type of intraoral scanner affect the accuracy of the intraoral digital impression. The trueness of the digital images of the BC group, obtained by spraying the powder, was comparable to that of the PS group. Among the adjacent restorative materials, zirconia exhibited the lowest trueness. In contrast, PS demonstrated the highest precision among the intraoral scanners, while resin displayed the lowest precision among the adjacent restorative materials.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 24(1)
Pusan National University Dental Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
Pusan National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental materials and restorations
2.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.