Sources of Partisan Change: Evidence from the Shale Gas Shock in American Coal Country

What explains the shift to Republicans in places that historically voted for Democrats? This article tests a new explanation for part of this reversal. The shale gas revolution displaced coal, which intensified the salience of national environmental regulations and increased support for Republican presidential candidates. Analysis of presidential elections from 1972 to 2020 with a difference-in-differences design finds that the shale gas shock increased Republican vote share by 4.9 percentage points. Geospatial data, media analysis, and interviews show that voters blamed environmental regulations for their community’s decline and that the backlash was more likely to occur where the shale shock was least visible. The attribution of blame for economic dislocation helps to explain electoral behavior in places “left behind” and sheds light on political responses to climate policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732949
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sources of Partisan Change: Evidence from the Shale Gas Shock in American Coal Country

Alexander F. Gazmararian
8 citations
The Journal of Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
13.39
article

Sources of Partisan Change: Evidence from the Shale Gas Shock in American Coal Country

Alexander F. Gazmararian
article en
8 citations

Abstract

What explains the shift to Republicans in places that historically voted for Democrats? This article tests a new explanation for part of this reversal. The shale gas revolution displaced coal, which intensified the salience of national environmental regulations and increased support for Republican presidential candidates. Analysis of presidential elections from 1972 to 2020 with a difference-in-differences design finds that the shale gas shock increased Republican vote share by 4.9 percentage points. Geospatial data, media analysis, and interviews show that voters blamed environmental regulations for their community’s decline and that the backlash was more likely to occur where the shale shock was least visible. The attribution of blame for economic dislocation helps to explain electoral behavior in places “left behind” and sheds light on political responses to climate policy.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(2)
Princeton University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sources of Partisan Change: Evidence from the Shale Gas Shock in American Coal Country — Alexander F. Gazmararian · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS