The Effective Power of Military Coalitions: A Unified Theoretical and Empirical Model

We argue that the effective power of a coalition depends not only on its members’ raw capabilities but also how much effort they exert. Free riding and competition between partners mean a coalition’s power is not the sum of its members’ power. We develop a unified model of crisis bargaining and war-fighting between coalitions. Using data on the escalation and outcomes of international disputes, we structurally estimate the model parameters to identify determinants of countries’ force multipliers and audience costs. We find that demographic and economic characteristics are the most important determinants of military effectiveness, with regime type and geopolitical considerations playing lesser roles. The structural model also allows us to simulate counterfactual outcomes in disputes between coalitions. This allows us to test historical claims, such as the claim that earlier American involvement would have made a substantial difference in both World Wars, even in the face of strategic free riding by its allies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732953
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effective Power of Military Coalitions: A Unified Theoretical and Empirical Model

Brenton Kenkel, Kristopher W. Ramsay
1 citations
The Journal of Politics
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
article

The Effective Power of Military Coalitions: A Unified Theoretical and Empirical Model

Brenton Kenkel, Kristopher W. Ramsay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We argue that the effective power of a coalition depends not only on its members’ raw capabilities but also how much effort they exert. Free riding and competition between partners mean a coalition’s power is not the sum of its members’ power. We develop a unified model of crisis bargaining and war-fighting between coalitions. Using data on the escalation and outcomes of international disputes, we structurally estimate the model parameters to identify determinants of countries’ force multipliers and audience costs. We find that demographic and economic characteristics are the most important determinants of military effectiveness, with regime type and geopolitical considerations playing lesser roles. The structural model also allows us to simulate counterfactual outcomes in disputes between coalitions. This allows us to test historical claims, such as the claim that earlier American involvement would have made a substantial difference in both World Wars, even in the face of strategic free riding by its allies.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(3)
Vanderbilt University (US), Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.