Stocking density at feeders and drinkers and temporal feed restriction affects dairy cows' drinking behavior

Water is an essential resource for dairy cows, and its consumption is closely linked to feed intake. Social competition can lead to changes in drinking behavior, especially for subordinate cows. We studied how changes in stocking density at the feeder (1 or 2 cows per feeder), and drinker (6 or 12 cows per drinker) and a temporal feed restriction (14- or 24-h access) affects drinking in 4 groups of 6 cows each, following a Latin square design. We recorded drinking behavior within each group of 6 focal cows, and 2 were identified as most dominant, 2 as most subordinate, and the 2 others as intermediate, based on success in agonistic interactions at the drinker. Cows drank less water when feed availability was restricted (on average 5.3 ± 3.4 [SE] L/d less; 4.5% average difference). Subordinate cows also spent less time drinking when overstocked (9.3 ± 6.7 min/d less; 24.3% difference). During treatments with more competition, cows were more likely to be observed drinking in the hours after the peak in drinking observed for the control treatment. A high level of competition among group-housed animals is considered a welfare problem and can lead to injuries and reduced production. Our findings provide evidence that feed restriction and higher stocking density of cows at the drinker and feeders changes the drinking behavior of cows, with subordinate animals experiencing more pronounced effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2024-0585
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stocking density at feeders and drinkers and temporal feed restriction affects dairy cows' drinking behavior

Borbala Foris, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, Anne Boudon, Daniel M. Weary et al.
1 citations
JDS Communications
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
0.64
article

Stocking density at feeders and drinkers and temporal feed restriction affects dairy cows' drinking behavior

Borbala Foris, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, Anne Boudon, Daniel M. Weary, Nizzi Ellynn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Water is an essential resource for dairy cows, and its consumption is closely linked to feed intake. Social competition can lead to changes in drinking behavior, especially for subordinate cows. We studied how changes in stocking density at the feeder (1 or 2 cows per feeder), and drinker (6 or 12 cows per drinker) and a temporal feed restriction (14- or 24-h access) affects drinking in 4 groups of 6 cows each, following a Latin square design. We recorded drinking behavior within each group of 6 focal cows, and 2 were identified as most dominant, 2 as most subordinate, and the 2 others as intermediate, based on success in agonistic interactions at the drinker. Cows drank less water when feed availability was restricted (on average 5.3 ± 3.4 [SE] L/d less; 4.5% average difference). Subordinate cows also spent less time drinking when overstocked (9.3 ± 6.7 min/d less; 24.3% difference). During treatments with more competition, cows were more likely to be observed drinking in the hours after the peak in drinking observed for the control treatment. A high level of competition among group-housed animals is considered a welfare problem and can lead to injuries and reduced production. Our findings provide evidence that feed restriction and higher stocking density of cows at the drinker and feeders changes the drinking behavior of cows, with subordinate animals experiencing more pronounced effects.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage (FR), L'Institut Agro (FR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.