A re-evaluation of gender bias in receptiveness to scientific evidence of gender bias

Gender bias has been documented in many aspects of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) careers, yet efforts to identify the underlying causes have been inconclusive. To what extent do cognitive biases, including unequal receptiveness in women and men to evidence of gender bias, contribute to gender bias in STEM? We investigated receptiveness in a STEM context among members of the general public, by undertaking a high-powered (total <i>N</i> = 1171) replication, including three experiments (2 pre-registered) of the prominent study by Handley <i>et al</i>. [22]. It was hypothesized that men would evaluate a research summary reporting evidence of gender bias less favourably than women but that there would be no difference between men and women's evaluations of research summaries unrelated to gender bias. The results revealed no effect of the assessor's gender on receptiveness to scientific evidence of gender bias. The different results compared to those of Handley <i>et al</i>. [22] suggest either that the gender bias they detected has diminished in the past decade or that their findings are a false positive. The present research adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that some influential studies on cognitive 'markers' of gender bias warrant re-examination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240419
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A re-evaluation of gender bias in receptiveness to scientific evidence of gender bias

David R. Shanks, Nadia Yeo, Hollie A. Coles
2 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
article

A re-evaluation of gender bias in receptiveness to scientific evidence of gender bias

David R. Shanks, Nadia Yeo, Hollie A. Coles
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gender bias has been documented in many aspects of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) careers, yet efforts to identify the underlying causes have been inconclusive. To what extent do cognitive biases, including unequal receptiveness in women and men to evidence of gender bias, contribute to gender bias in STEM? We investigated receptiveness in a STEM context among members of the general public, by undertaking a high-powered (total <i>N</i> = 1171) replication, including three experiments (2 pre-registered) of the prominent study by Handley <i>et al</i>. [22]. It was hypothesized that men would evaluate a research summary reporting evidence of gender bias less favourably than women but that there would be no difference between men and women's evaluations of research summaries unrelated to gender bias. The results revealed no effect of the assessor's gender on receptiveness to scientific evidence of gender bias. The different results compared to those of Handley <i>et al</i>. [22] suggest either that the gender bias they detected has diminished in the past decade or that their findings are a false positive. The present research adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that some influential studies on cognitive 'markers' of gender bias warrant re-examination.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 11(9)
University College London (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.