Geographic Variations in Urban‐Rural Particulate Matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) Concentrations in the United States, 2010–2019

Fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is a widely studied pollutant with substantial health impacts, yet little is known about the urban-rural differences across the United States. Trends of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in urban and rural census tracts between 2010 and 2019 were assessed alongside sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, poverty, and age. For 2010, we identified 13,474 rural tracts and 59,065 urban tracts. In 2019, 13,462 were rural and 59,055 urban. Urban tracts had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations than rural tracts during this period. Levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were lower in rural tracts compared to urban and fell more rapidly in rural than urban. Rural tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 8.51 [2.24] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 6.41 [1.29] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Urban tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 9.56 [2.04] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.51 [1.40] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Rural and urban majority Black communities had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution levels (10.19 [1.64] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 9.79 [1.10] μg/m<sup>3</sup> respectively), in 2010. In 2019, they were: 7.75 [1.1] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.09 [0.78] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Majority Hispanic communities had higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels and were the highest urban concentration among all races/ethnicities (8.01 [1.73] μg/m<sup>3</sup>), however they were not the highest rural concentration among all races/ethnicities (6.22 [1.60] μg/m<sup>3</sup>) in 2019. Associations with higher levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were found with communities in the poorest quartile and with higher proportions of residents age<15 years old. These findings suggest greater protections for those disproportionately exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> are needed, such as, increasing the availability of low-cost air quality monitors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GeoHealth
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gh000920
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographic Variations in Urban‐Rural Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentrations in the United States, 2010–2019

Stella Self, Daniel J. Kilpatrick, Jan M. Eberth, Elizabeth L. Crouch et al.
15 citations
GeoHealth
Air Quality and Health Impacts
4.72
article

Geographic Variations in Urban‐Rural Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentrations in the United States, 2010–2019

Stella Self, Daniel J. Kilpatrick, Jan M. Eberth, Elizabeth L. Crouch, Peiyin Hung, Dwayne E. Porter, Jeremy Cothran
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is a widely studied pollutant with substantial health impacts, yet little is known about the urban-rural differences across the United States. Trends of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in urban and rural census tracts between 2010 and 2019 were assessed alongside sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, poverty, and age. For 2010, we identified 13,474 rural tracts and 59,065 urban tracts. In 2019, 13,462 were rural and 59,055 urban. Urban tracts had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations than rural tracts during this period. Levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were lower in rural tracts compared to urban and fell more rapidly in rural than urban. Rural tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 8.51 [2.24] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 6.41 [1.29] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Urban tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 9.56 [2.04] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.51 [1.40] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Rural and urban majority Black communities had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution levels (10.19 [1.64] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 9.79 [1.10] μg/m<sup>3</sup> respectively), in 2010. In 2019, they were: 7.75 [1.1] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.09 [0.78] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Majority Hispanic communities had higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels and were the highest urban concentration among all races/ethnicities (8.01 [1.73] μg/m<sup>3</sup>), however they were not the highest rural concentration among all races/ethnicities (6.22 [1.60] μg/m<sup>3</sup>) in 2019. Associations with higher levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were found with communities in the poorest quartile and with higher proportions of residents age<15 years old. These findings suggest greater protections for those disproportionately exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> are needed, such as, increasing the availability of low-cost air quality monitors.

GeoHealthVol. 8(9)
University of South Carolina (US), Drexel University (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Rural Health, Federal Office of Rural Health Policy
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
4.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.