Application of criminal law measures as a legal institution

The article highlights the issues of application of criminal law measures as an independent regulatory and legal institution which has a cross-sectoral nature. This institute is complex, since it includes two sub-institutes – criminal law and criminal procedure, and is characterized by its subject matter and method of legal regulation, and is intended to regulate social relations which arose in connection with the introduction in Ukraine of the institute of quasi-criminal liability of legal entities for the fulfillment of Ukraine’s international obligations. The author suggests that a regulatory legal institution should be set out in a standardized manner in various legal acts. Unlike the criminal law sub-institution of application of criminal law measures, criminal procedural rules are «scattered» throughout the text of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, which impedes the effective application of the relevant rules. The analysis of the few verdicts that have imposed criminal legal measures on legal entities indicates that, given both the normative shortcomings in the presentation of criminal procedural rules of the institution of application of criminal legal measures and the actual lack of training of interested parties (investigators, prosecutors, judges, lawyers) in specialized educational institutions, this leads to shortcomings in law enforcement and the actual ineffectiveness of the institution as a whole. The author finds that when applying criminal law measures to a legal entity, courts made the following mistakes: they did so independently, without following the procedure for initiating proceedings against a legal entity regulated by criminal procedure legislation; in criminal proceedings against an individual, they approved a plea agreement with a criminal law measure against a legal entity when it was prohibited to do so. The author proposes to conduct specialized training on criminal law and criminal procedural features of quasi-criminal liability of legal entities in Ukraine for investigators, prosecutors, attorneys and judges.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.83.3.7
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of criminal law measures as a legal institution

Z. A. Zahynei-Zabolotenko
Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law
Legal and Policy Issues
article

Application of criminal law measures as a legal institution

Z. A. Zahynei-Zabolotenko
article en

Abstract

The article highlights the issues of application of criminal law measures as an independent regulatory and legal institution which has a cross-sectoral nature. This institute is complex, since it includes two sub-institutes – criminal law and criminal procedure, and is characterized by its subject matter and method of legal regulation, and is intended to regulate social relations which arose in connection with the introduction in Ukraine of the institute of quasi-criminal liability of legal entities for the fulfillment of Ukraine’s international obligations. The author suggests that a regulatory legal institution should be set out in a standardized manner in various legal acts. Unlike the criminal law sub-institution of application of criminal law measures, criminal procedural rules are «scattered» throughout the text of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, which impedes the effective application of the relevant rules. The analysis of the few verdicts that have imposed criminal legal measures on legal entities indicates that, given both the normative shortcomings in the presentation of criminal procedural rules of the institution of application of criminal legal measures and the actual lack of training of interested parties (investigators, prosecutors, judges, lawyers) in specialized educational institutions, this leads to shortcomings in law enforcement and the actual ineffectiveness of the institution as a whole. The author finds that when applying criminal law measures to a legal entity, courts made the following mistakes: they did so independently, without following the procedure for initiating proceedings against a legal entity regulated by criminal procedure legislation; in criminal proceedings against an individual, they approved a plea agreement with a criminal law measure against a legal entity when it was prohibited to do so. The author proposes to conduct specialized training on criminal law and criminal procedural features of quasi-criminal liability of legal entities in Ukraine for investigators, prosecutors, attorneys and judges.

Uzhhorod National University Herald Series LawVol. 3(83)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.