An eco-strategy for development of more sustainable coatings

Addressing the significant challenges stemming from human activity on the environment requires active participation from all sectors, including the coatings industry. While there has been considerable effort to encourage individual involvement and responsibility, there lacks an overarching eco-strategy for the industry as a whole. This work proposes a guideline to prioritize efforts for maximum positive environmental impact, focusing specifically on the direct product-related impacts of the coatings industry (Scope 3). The eco-strategy is founded on two main components: a “red list” outlining hazardous ingredients to be avoided to comply with legislation and a Life Cycle assessment of all raw materials used in the coatings industry in a year. It concludes that a “red list” will be different when the coatings are for industrial use under controlled conditions or if the coatings are for consumer use. Hazardous ingredients may be required to enable production of durable coatings to be used in industry, while the same hazardous substances are recommended to be reduced or even phased out in consumer products. The findings from the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on the industry's use of raw materials reveals that epoxy resins, titanium dioxide, acrylic resins, and metallic zinc dust collectively account for over 50 % of environmental impacts across all assessed categories due to their high usage volumes combined with their impact potential. As such, substitution or further development of these raw material groups should be prioritized for future research and development in academic and within the industry. Moreover, the eco-strategy underscores the importance of durability in achieving environmental sustainability. Any substitution of raw materials must ensure comparable or even improved durability of the coatings to maintain environmental benefits. • Life Cycle Assessment of the coatings industry's use of raw-materials. • A ‘red list‘of substances and products used in the coatings industry. • Using LCA to find create an eco-strategy for the coatings industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Organic Coatings
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.108781
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An eco-strategy for development of more sustainable coatings

Mads Juhl, Michael Zwicky Hauschild, Kim Dam‐Johansen
14 citations
Progress in Organic Coatings
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.86
article

An eco-strategy for development of more sustainable coatings

Mads Juhl, Michael Zwicky Hauschild, Kim Dam‐Johansen
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Addressing the significant challenges stemming from human activity on the environment requires active participation from all sectors, including the coatings industry. While there has been considerable effort to encourage individual involvement and responsibility, there lacks an overarching eco-strategy for the industry as a whole. This work proposes a guideline to prioritize efforts for maximum positive environmental impact, focusing specifically on the direct product-related impacts of the coatings industry (Scope 3). The eco-strategy is founded on two main components: a “red list” outlining hazardous ingredients to be avoided to comply with legislation and a Life Cycle assessment of all raw materials used in the coatings industry in a year. It concludes that a “red list” will be different when the coatings are for industrial use under controlled conditions or if the coatings are for consumer use. Hazardous ingredients may be required to enable production of durable coatings to be used in industry, while the same hazardous substances are recommended to be reduced or even phased out in consumer products. The findings from the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on the industry's use of raw materials reveals that epoxy resins, titanium dioxide, acrylic resins, and metallic zinc dust collectively account for over 50 % of environmental impacts across all assessed categories due to their high usage volumes combined with their impact potential. As such, substitution or further development of these raw material groups should be prioritized for future research and development in academic and within the industry. Moreover, the eco-strategy underscores the importance of durability in achieving environmental sustainability. Any substitution of raw materials must ensure comparable or even improved durability of the coatings to maintain environmental benefits. • Life Cycle Assessment of the coatings industry's use of raw-materials. • A ‘red list‘of substances and products used in the coatings industry. • Using LCA to find create an eco-strategy for the coatings industry.

Progress in Organic CoatingsVol. 197
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.