Impact of secondary health conditions on the quality of life and wellbeing of Canadians living with spinal cord injury: A comparison of preference-weighted index scores derived from generic standardized instruments

Higher problem ratings for SHCs are negatively associated with scores derived from preference-based quality of life and wellbeing instruments. Variation in index scores across instruments - including across the health-related instruments alone - highlights the critical importance of assessing the <i>relative</i> merits of preference-based instruments when using (or considering using) these instruments/estimates in comparative effectiveness research and economic evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391597
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of secondary health conditions on the quality of life and wellbeing of Canadians living with spinal cord injury: A comparison of preference-weighted index scores derived from generic standardized instruments

Hasina Samji, David G. T. Whitehurst, Nazafarin Esfandiari
1 citations
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
article

Impact of secondary health conditions on the quality of life and wellbeing of Canadians living with spinal cord injury: A comparison of preference-weighted index scores derived from generic standardized instruments

Hasina Samji, David G. T. Whitehurst, Nazafarin Esfandiari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Higher problem ratings for SHCs are negatively associated with scores derived from preference-based quality of life and wellbeing instruments. Variation in index scores across instruments - including across the health-related instruments alone - highlights the critical importance of assessing the <i>relative</i> merits of preference-based instruments when using (or considering using) these instruments/estimates in comparative effectiveness research and economic evaluation.

Journal of Spinal Cord MedicineVol. 48(4)
University of British Columbia (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries (CA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.