Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Hearing Loss Type Classification: an Evaluation

The evaluation of hearing loss is primarily conducted by pure tone audiometry testing, which is often regarded as golden standard for assessing auditory function. If the presence of hearing loss is determined, it is possible to differentiate between three types of hearing loss: sensorineural, conductive, and mixed. This study presents a comprehensive comparison of a variety of AI classification models, performed on 4007 pure tone audiometry samples that have been labeled by professional audiologists in order to develop an automatic classifier of hearing loss type. The tested models include Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Decision Trees, Random Forest, Feedforward Neural Network (FNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). The presented work also investigates the influence of training dataset augmentation with the use of a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network on the performance of machine learning algorithms and examines the impact of various standardization procedures on the effectiveness of deep learning architectures. Overall, the highest classification performance, was achieved by LSTM with an out-of-training accuracy of 97.56%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14313/jamris/3-2024/19
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Hearing Loss Type Classification: an Evaluation

Marcin Kulawiak, Andrzej Molisz, Jagoda Kuryłowicz, Dmitry Tretiakow et al.
2 citations
Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems
Gait Recognition and Analysis
0.37
article

Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Hearing Loss Type Classification: an Evaluation

Marcin Kulawiak, Andrzej Molisz, Jagoda Kuryłowicz, Dmitry Tretiakow, Aleksandra Kwaśniewska, Michał Kassjański, Tomasz Przewoźny, Krzysztof Koźmiński, Paulina Mierzwińska-Dolny, Miłosz Grono
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The evaluation of hearing loss is primarily conducted by pure tone audiometry testing, which is often regarded as golden standard for assessing auditory function. If the presence of hearing loss is determined, it is possible to differentiate between three types of hearing loss: sensorineural, conductive, and mixed. This study presents a comprehensive comparison of a variety of AI classification models, performed on 4007 pure tone audiometry samples that have been labeled by professional audiologists in order to develop an automatic classifier of hearing loss type. The tested models include Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Decision Trees, Random Forest, Feedforward Neural Network (FNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). The presented work also investigates the influence of training dataset augmentation with the use of a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network on the performance of machine learning algorithms and examines the impact of various standardization procedures on the effectiveness of deep learning architectures. Overall, the highest classification performance, was achieved by LSTM with an out-of-training accuracy of 97.56%.

Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), University of Bydgoszcz (PL), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.