Reclaiming Initial Teacher Education in universities: Moving beyond a technicist model

Recent policy developments in England, particularly since 2021, have resulted in increased regulation and marketisation of Initial Teacher Training (ITT)/Initial Teacher Education (ITE). Although the origins of these developments go back much further than 2021, the current context in which ITE operates in England is, arguably, both challenging and unstable. Since 2010, the Government has increased the involvement of schools in ITE, creating an unstable climate for those who work in ITE in universities, through the School Direct initiative. School-Centred Initial teacher Training (SCITT) routes also precede this. The involvement of schools in ITE in England has extended to schools taking a leading role in the recruitment, selection and training of teachers and these developments have also, in some quarters, resulted in an anti-intellectual, anti-theoretical and anti-university discourse, which has been damaging to universities. This paper argues that current policy developments in ITE are reductionist and technicist and makes a case for the role of universities in ITE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Futures in Education
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241279582
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reclaiming Initial Teacher Education in universities: Moving beyond a technicist model

Adam L. Tate, Jonathan Glazzard
4 citations
Policy Futures in Education
Education Systems and Policy
8.38
article

Reclaiming Initial Teacher Education in universities: Moving beyond a technicist model

Adam L. Tate, Jonathan Glazzard
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Recent policy developments in England, particularly since 2021, have resulted in increased regulation and marketisation of Initial Teacher Training (ITT)/Initial Teacher Education (ITE). Although the origins of these developments go back much further than 2021, the current context in which ITE operates in England is, arguably, both challenging and unstable. Since 2010, the Government has increased the involvement of schools in ITE, creating an unstable climate for those who work in ITE in universities, through the School Direct initiative. School-Centred Initial teacher Training (SCITT) routes also precede this. The involvement of schools in ITE in England has extended to schools taking a leading role in the recruitment, selection and training of teachers and these developments have also, in some quarters, resulted in an anti-intellectual, anti-theoretical and anti-university discourse, which has been damaging to universities. This paper argues that current policy developments in ITE are reductionist and technicist and makes a case for the role of universities in ITE.

Policy Futures in EducationVol. 23(2)
University of Hull (GB), Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Education Systems and Policy
8.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reclaiming Initial Teacher Education in universities: Moving beyond a technicist model — Adam L. Tate, Jonathan Glazzard · Policy Futures in Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS