BP3M: Bayesian Positions, Parallaxes, and Proper Motions Derived from the Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia Data

Abstract We present a hierarchical Bayesian pipeline, BP3M , that measures positions, parallaxes, and proper motions (PMs) for cross-matched sources between Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images and Gaia—even for sparse fields ( N * < 10 per image)—expanding from the recent GaiaHub tool. This technique uses Gaia-measured astrometry as priors to predict the locations of sources in HST images, and is therefore able to put the HST images onto a global reference frame without the use of background galaxies/QSOs. Testing our publicly available code in the Fornax and Draco dwarf spheroidal galaxies, we measure PMs that are a median of 8–13 times more precise than Gaia DR3 alone for 20.5 < G < 21 mag. We are able to explore the effect of observation strategies on BP3M astrometry using synthetic data, finding an optimal strategy to improve parallax and position precision at no cost to the PM uncertainty. Using 1619 HST images in the sparse COSMOS field (median nine Gaia sources per HST image), we measure BP3M PMs for 2640 unique sources in the 16 < G < 21.5 mag range, 25% of which have no Gaia PMs; the median BP3M PM uncertainty for 20.25 < G < 20.75 mag sources is 0.44 mas yr −1 compared to 1.03 mas yr −1 from Gaia, while the median BP3M PM uncertainty for sources without Gaia-measured PMs (20.75 < G < 21.5 mag) is 1.16 mas yr −1 . The statistics that underpin the BP3M pipeline are a generalized way of combining position measurements from different images, epochs, and telescopes, which allows information to be shared between surveys and archives to achieve higher astrometric precision than that from each catalog alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5834
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BP3M: Bayesian Positions, Parallaxes, and Proper Motions Derived from the Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia Data

Kevin McKinnon, Roeland P. van der Marel, Sangmo Tony Sohn, Laura L. Watkins et al.
5 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.66
article

BP3M: Bayesian Positions, Parallaxes, and Proper Motions Derived from the Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia Data

Kevin McKinnon, Roeland P. van der Marel, Sangmo Tony Sohn, Laura L. Watkins, Miranda Apfel, Constance M. Rockosi, Paul Bennet, Mattia Libralato, Puragra Guhathakurta, Eduardo Vitral, Mark A. Fardal, Andrés del Pino
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present a hierarchical Bayesian pipeline, BP3M , that measures positions, parallaxes, and proper motions (PMs) for cross-matched sources between Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images and Gaia—even for sparse fields ( N * < 10 per image)—expanding from the recent GaiaHub tool. This technique uses Gaia-measured astrometry as priors to predict the locations of sources in HST images, and is therefore able to put the HST images onto a global reference frame without the use of background galaxies/QSOs. Testing our publicly available code in the Fornax and Draco dwarf spheroidal galaxies, we measure PMs that are a median of 8–13 times more precise than Gaia DR3 alone for 20.5 < G < 21 mag. We are able to explore the effect of observation strategies on BP3M astrometry using synthetic data, finding an optimal strategy to improve parallax and position precision at no cost to the PM uncertainty. Using 1619 HST images in the sparse COSMOS field (median nine Gaia sources per HST image), we measure BP3M PMs for 2640 unique sources in the 16 < G < 21.5 mag range, 25% of which have no Gaia PMs; the median BP3M PM uncertainty for 20.25 < G < 20.75 mag sources is 0.44 mas yr −1 compared to 1.03 mas yr −1 from Gaia, while the median BP3M PM uncertainty for sources without Gaia-measured PMs (20.75 < G < 21.5 mag) is 1.16 mas yr −1 . The statistics that underpin the BP3M pipeline are a generalized way of combining position measurements from different images, epochs, and telescopes, which allows information to be shared between surveys and archives to achieve higher astrometric precision than that from each catalog alone.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 972(2)
Space Telescope Science Institute (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics (CA), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), Centro de Estudios de Física del Cosmos de Aragón (ES), Eureka Scientific (US), Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT), National Institute for Astrophysics (IT)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Space Telescope Science Institute, European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.