A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist
The final checklist is presented along with guidance on how to apply it. This checklist can be used by authors to ensure that sufficient detail of a DCE's methods are reported, providing reviewers and readers with the information they need to assess the quality of the study for themselves. Embedding this reporting checklist into standard practice for health DCEs offers an opportunity to improve consistency of reporting standards, thereby enabling transparency of review and facilitating comparison of studies and their translation into policy and practice.
Authors
- Christine LaBond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-1059)
- Jemimah Ride (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-5499)
- Ilias Goranitis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7946-8324)
- Yan Meng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2274-3249)
- Emily Lancsar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-6735)
Institutions
- Australian National University (AU)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Institute of Group Analysis (GB)
- Melbourne Health (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2024-09-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01431-6
- Citations
- 67
- Primary Topic
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 75.66
Funders
- Monash University
- University of Melbourne