Robust Risk Control with Reinsurance and CAT Bonds

This research studies robust risk control policies for an ambiguity-averse insurer. The insurer can manage its risk exposure through the purchase of reinsurance and the issuance of parametric catastrophe (CAT) bonds, which are linked to an exogenous trigger index. The insurer worries about the veracity of the model and seeks to develop a robust strategy to minimize the discounted ruin probability. We allow the insurer to exhibit different levels of ambiguity aversion toward its own claims and the trigger index. By employing a robust control approach, we analytically derive the optimal risk control policies that provide the insurer with guidelines on how to effectively manage its risk in an ambiguous environment. We present numerical examples that showcase scenarios in which CAT bonds can be utilized as an effective risk mitigation tool. Furthermore, we assess the potential welfare losses that could arise if the insurer fails to account for model uncertainty or lacks the ability to issue CAT bonds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Actuarial Journal
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2024.2347846
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust Risk Control with Reinsurance and CAT Bonds

Yongwu Li, Pengyu Wei
3 citations
North American Actuarial Journal
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.39
article

Robust Risk Control with Reinsurance and CAT Bonds

Yongwu Li, Pengyu Wei
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This research studies robust risk control policies for an ambiguity-averse insurer. The insurer can manage its risk exposure through the purchase of reinsurance and the issuance of parametric catastrophe (CAT) bonds, which are linked to an exogenous trigger index. The insurer worries about the veracity of the model and seeks to develop a robust strategy to minimize the discounted ruin probability. We allow the insurer to exhibit different levels of ambiguity aversion toward its own claims and the trigger index. By employing a robust control approach, we analytically derive the optimal risk control policies that provide the insurer with guidelines on how to effectively manage its risk in an ambiguous environment. We present numerical examples that showcase scenarios in which CAT bonds can be utilized as an effective risk mitigation tool. Furthermore, we assess the potential welfare losses that could arise if the insurer fails to account for model uncertainty or lacks the ability to issue CAT bonds.

North American Actuarial JournalVol. 29(1)
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Beijing University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.